V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamSeptember 1, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Seedance 2.0 Mini evaluation example
Seedance 2.0 Mini
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0 Mini

68.7Overall score
Rank
#11
Price per minute
$4.54/min
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.6Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 12.9 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 18.7 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $4.54/min for Seedance 2.0 Mini.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Seedance 2.0 Mini

Seedance 2.0 Mini generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins all 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapHuman: Wan 3.0 ahead by 21.9 points.
Closest categoryAnimals: Wan 3.0 ahead by 1.4 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Seedance 2.0 MiniWan 3.0
Physics
50.6
71.8
Prompt Adherence
87.7
94.7
Logic Consistency
70.9
78.2
Scene Consistency
78.0
92.9
Cinematography
67.1
72.9
Taste
60.7
68.1
2D Animation
61.7
70.0
3D Animation
62.0
76.0
Human
64.8
86.7
Actor Performance
63.0
66.0
Objects
88.4
98.7
Animals
82.9
84.3
Text Fidelity
63.8
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilitySeedance 2.0 MiniWan 3.0
Text inputYesUnlisted
Image inputYesUnlisted
Video inputYesUnlisted
Audio inputYesUnlisted
Image outputNoUnlisted
Audio outputYesUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini better than Wan 3.0?

Not on our scores — Wan 3.0 edges ahead overall, 81.6 to 68.7, winning 13 of 13 rated categories. Seedance 2.0 Mini still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini cheaper than Wan 3.0?

No — Wan 3.0 is the cheaper option at $1.95/min, versus $4.54/min for Seedance 2.0 Mini.

Does Seedance 2.0 Mini generate audio?

Yes — Seedance 2.0 Mini generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for human?

Wan 3.0 leads human, by 21.9 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 21.2 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 18.7 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 15.0 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 14.0 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for objects?

Wan 3.0 leads objects, by 10.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 8.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for taste?

Wan 3.0 leads taste, by 7.4 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 7.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 Mini or Wan 3.0 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 7.0 points.

How are Seedance 2.0 Mini and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba69.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance69.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 69.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniBlack Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 69.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance76.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 69.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniMiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 69.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Seedance 2.0 Minifal.aiByteDance75.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance70.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance69.0 / 69.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle69.0 / 63.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniRunwayByteDance61.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0 MiniLightricksByteDance52.0 / 69.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.5GoogleByteDance76.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 87.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0GoogleByteDance76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.5MiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 76.0

Methodology

How we tested Seedance 2.0 Mini and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 1, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.