Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

<report>

Lightricks

LTX 2.3 22B

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Generated via Lightricks · August 4, 2026Evaluated · August 9, 2026Leaderboard rank #15 of 15Last updated · August 11, 2026

51.80

/ 100

Add as preferred source
Get the latest video releases and leaderboard updates

Categories

Weight
C01Prompt Adherence20%72.96C02Scene Consistency10%64.18C03Physics20%40.00C04Human Fidelity10%50.74C052D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%33.33C063D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%42.50C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry2.5%58.57C08Taste & Art Direction6.5%42.00C09Animal & Creature Fidelity1.5%44.29C10Object & Product Fidelity1.5%48.25C11Causal & Semantic Coherence7.5%46.36C12Text Fidelity1.5%11.57C13Character Performance & Acting1.5%41.00C14Delivered File & Playback Integrity0.5%99.83C15Quality + Reliability2%84.26

Get the full report

Get the LTX 2.3 22B test results, reviewer notes, and model comparisons.

Are you part of the Lightricks team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
View paid access →Request a complimentary full report →

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

40.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions only partly reliably, with frequent important failures.

This Category

73.0

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Most prompt requirements are fulfilled, though complex combinations or secondary details recur as limitations.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential1
Major1
Minor1
This Category
Essential43
Major61
Minor33

60 videos

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

86.2

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time very reliably, with only isolated limitations.

This Category

64.2

50 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Scene continuity is generally readable, but noticeable instability appears across multiple videos.

Violations

This Video
Essential1
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential81
Major55
Minor27

50 videos

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

40.0

This Video · Assessment

The event occurs, but its physical behavior is clearly implausible.

This Category

40.0

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Physics is only partly reliable; implausible trajectories, contacts, or material behavior recur frequently.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Believable overall, with clear defects under inspection.

This Category

50.7

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human results are recognizable but uneven, with repeated synthetic, uncanny, or anatomical weaknesses.

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Competent and coherent but visibly synthetic, mechanically interpolated, or artistically underdeveloped.

This Category

33.3

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended 2D style is present, but animation execution is commonly weak.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

30.0

This Video · Assessment

Severe deformation, articulation, contact, rendering, or medium-coherence failures.

This Category

42.5

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Convincing 3D craft appears only in some cases; articulation, contact, rendering, or staging failures recur frequently.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended shot is clearly readable, but repeated important visual weaknesses leave the cinematography only partly convincing.

This Category

58.6

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Intended shots remain readable, but framing, focus, lighting, or camera movement is uneven across the set.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

Several successful individual choices are present, but repeated inconsistencies leave the overall art direction only partly resolved.

This Category

42.0

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Strong art direction appears only in some cases; weak hierarchy, cliché, clutter, or stylistic indecision recurs frequently.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended animal or creature is clearly recognizable, but repeated anatomical or behavioral defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

44.3

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Convincing fidelity appears only in some cases; limb, gait, surface, face, or interaction failures recur frequently.

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

93.5

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

48.3

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Only some objects are rendered reliably; identity, geometry, material, or interaction failures are frequent.

Violations

This Video
Essential1
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential20
Major10
Minor0

8 videos

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

30.0

This Video · Assessment

Severe causal, role, or state-transition failures.

This Category

46.4

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Coherent progression appears only in some cases; causal, role, or state failures recur frequently.

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

19.4

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability only as a weak suggestion of the requested result.

This Category

11.6

6 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Only isolated cases retain a weak approximation of the requested text.

Violations

This Video
Essential7
Major2
Minor0
This Category
Essential42
Major12
Minor1

6 videos

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

30.0

This Video · Assessment

Actions occur but have little understandable emotional or intentional basis.

This Category

41.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Convincing acting appears only in some cases; unclear intention, mismatched expression, or poor timing recurs frequently.

Differences between other models

Megatonmegaton.ai

C01Prompt Adherence

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C03Physics

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C02Scene Consistency

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C04Human Fidelity

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C052D Animation Craft & Artistry

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C063D Animation Craft & Artistry

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C11Causal & Semantic Coherence

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C08Taste & Art Direction

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C09Animal & Creature Fidelity

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C10Object & Product Fidelity

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C12Text Fidelity

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
Megatonmegaton.ai

C13Character Performance & Acting

LTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
CategoryLTX 2.3 22BKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 MiniVeo 3.1Gen-4.5
C01Prompt Adherence73.082.687.779.576.1
C03Physics40.057.650.645.338.8
C02Scene Consistency64.282.578.080.078.1
C04Human Fidelity50.779.664.865.967.4
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry33.346.461.745.047.5
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry42.566.062.049.044.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence46.466.470.965.572.7
C08Taste & Art Direction42.063.160.751.949.7
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry58.675.767.162.970.0
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity44.371.482.967.161.4
C10Object & Product Fidelity48.390.088.495.474.5
C12Text Fidelity11.630.363.841.747.2
C13Character Performance & Acting41.059.063.062.063.0

Leaderboard

Megatonmegaton.ai
Megaton

Video Index

Measuring video model quality and performance

Video Index · 0–100

Scores are from the active Megaton v-benchmark v2.0 publication. See how our scores are calculated in our Methodology.

<Cite this report>

Citation snippet

Copy a plain-text citation for articles and research.

Megaton. “LTX 2.3 22B V-Benchmark v2 report.” V-Benchmark results publication 1.4.0, September 10, 2026. https://megaton.ai/evaluations/lightricks/ltx-2-3-22b-dev/report

Report badge

The badge links to this report so readers can verify the ranking.

LTX 2.3 22B is ranked #15 in Megaton V-Benchmark v2

Methodology

Our score is based on our v-benchmark v2 methodology.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Published
August 11, 2026
V-Benchmark version
2.0.0
Megaton Index
51.80
Published rank
11 of 11
View model changelog →

<What you get>

  • The prompts and outputs used in our tests.
  • Scores and notes explaining each result.
  • Comparisons with other models and versions.

<Who can get access>

  • Are you part of the Lightricks team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
  • University and nonprofit researchers can ask about research access.
  • Paid access starts at $2,500 per report.
Access option

We’ll use these details to reply to your request.