Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamSeptember 14, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
P-Video 2 evaluation example
P-Video 2
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Try Wan 3.0

Affiliate link: Megaton may earn a commission if you purchase, at no extra cost to you.

Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Pruna AI

Pruna AI

P-Video 2

65.9Overall score
Rank
#13
Price per minute
$1.50/min
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.6Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 15.7 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 61.9 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

P-Video 2

P-Video 2 runs $1.50/min, against $1.95/min for Wan 3.0.

Provider prices can change.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 14, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins 11 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Wan 3.0 ahead by 61.9 points.
Closest categoryActor Performance: P-Video 2 ahead by 5.0 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

P-Video 2Wan 3.0
Physics
58.2
71.8
Prompt Adherence
73.0
94.7
Logic Consistency
62.7
78.2
Scene Consistency
80.2
93.0
Cinematography
78.6
72.9
Taste
62.2
68.1
2D Animation
38.3
70.0
3D Animation
62.5
76.0
Human
81.1
86.7
Actor Performance
71.0
66.0
Objects
59.8
98.7
Animals
67.1
84.3
Text Fidelity
20.6
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full P-Video 2 detailsSee full Wan 3.0 details
CapabilityP-Video 2Wan 3.0
Text inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image inputUnlistedUnlisted
Video inputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image outputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio outputUnlistedUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is P-Video 2 better than Wan 3.0?

Not on our scores — Wan 3.0 edges ahead overall, 81.6 to 65.9, winning 11 of 13 rated categories. P-Video 2 still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is P-Video 2 cheaper than Wan 3.0?

Yes. P-Video 2 runs $1.50/min, against $1.95/min for Wan 3.0.

Does P-Video 2 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for P-Video 2 yet.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 61.9 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for objects?

Wan 3.0 leads objects, by 38.9 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 31.7 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 21.7 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for animals?

Wan 3.0 leads animals, by 17.2 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 15.5 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 13.5 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 13.5 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 12.8 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Wan 3.0 better for taste?

Wan 3.0 leads taste, by 5.8 points.

How are P-Video 2 and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

P-Video 2

Wan 3.0

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba73.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba69.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance66.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0Pruna AIByteDance66.0 / 78.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba62.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs P-Video 2Black Forest LabsPruna AI77.0 / 66.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs P-Video 2GooglePruna AI76.0 / 66.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI76.0 / 66.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs P-Video 2MiniMaxPruna AI75.0 / 66.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs P-Video 2fal.aiPruna AI75.0 / 66.0
H3 Max Turbo vs P-Video 2MiniMaxPruna AI73.0 / 66.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs P-Video 2GooglePruna AI70.0 / 66.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI69.0 / 66.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniPruna AIByteDance66.0 / 69.0
P-Video 2 vs Veo 3.1Pruna AIGoogle66.0 / 62.0
P-Video 2 vs Gen-4.5Pruna AIRunway66.0 / 61.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs P-Video 2LightricksPruna AI52.0 / 66.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.5GoogleByteDance76.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 78.0

Methodology

How we tested P-Video 2 and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 14, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports