Megaton
#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2▲$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0
#3▼$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4▲$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro
#5▼$0.15/sBlack Forest LabsFLUX 3

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamOctober 2, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
Seedance 2.0 evaluation example
Seedance 2.0
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0

77.6Overall score
Rank
#3
Price per minute
$7.26/min
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.7Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 4.1 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 leads by 3.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
October 2, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins 10 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapPrompt Adherence: Wan 3.0 ahead by 7.3 points.
Closest categoryObjects: Wan 3.0 ahead by 0.5 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Seedance 2.0Wan 3.0
Physics
66.5
71.8
Prompt Adherence
87.6
94.9
Logic Consistency
80.9
78.2
Scene Consistency
92.3
93.0
Cinematography
68.6
72.9
Taste
63.2
68.1
2D Animation
66.7
70.0
3D Animation
70.0
76.0
Human
82.2
86.7
Actor Performance
66.7
66.0
Objects
98.2
98.7
Animals
80.0
84.3
Text Fidelity
85.8
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Seedance 2.0 detailsSee full Wan 3.0 details
CapabilitySeedance 2.0Wan 3.0
Text inputYesUnlisted
Image inputYesUnlisted
Video inputYesUnlisted
Audio inputYesUnlisted
Image outputNoUnlisted
Audio outputYesUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is Seedance 2.0 better than Wan 3.0?

Not on our scores — Wan 3.0 edges ahead overall, 81.7 to 77.6, winning 10 of 13 rated categories. Seedance 2.0 still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is Seedance 2.0 cheaper than Wan 3.0?

No — Wan 3.0 is the cheaper option at $1.95/min, versus $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.

Does Seedance 2.0 generate audio?

Yes — Seedance 2.0 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 7.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 6.0 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 5.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for taste?

Wan 3.0 leads taste, by 4.9 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for human?

Wan 3.0 leads human, by 4.5 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for cinematography?

Wan 3.0 leads cinematography, by 4.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for animals?

Wan 3.0 leads animals, by 4.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 3.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

Seedance 2.0 leads text fidelity, by 3.3 points.

Is Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 better for logic consistency?

Seedance 2.0 leads logic consistency, by 2.7 points.

How are Seedance 2.0 and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

Seedance 2.0

Wan 3.0

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.0Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 78.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0GoogleByteDance76.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba74.0 / 82.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.0MiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 78.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba73.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Seedance 2.0fal.aiByteDance74.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba70.0 / 82.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Seedance 2.0MiniMaxByteDance73.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Seedance 2.0GoogleByteDance70.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba66.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 69.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0Pruna AIByteDance66.0 / 78.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 63.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0RunwayByteDance61.0 / 78.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0LightricksByteDance52.0 / 78.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0

Methodology

How we tested Seedance 2.0 and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from October 2, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports