Our verdict
Wan 3.0 leads
Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.
ByteDance
Seedance 2.0
77.5Overall score
- Rank
- #3
- Price per minute
- $7.26/min
Alibaba
Wan 3.0
81.6Overall score
- Rank
- #2
- Price per minute
- $1.95/min
Best for
Highest overall score
Wan 3.0
Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 4.1 points.
The overall score does not measure file reliability.
Best for
More readable text
Seedance 2.0
Seedance 2.0 leads by 3.3 points.
Long or moving text still needs manual review.
Best for
Lower generation cost
Wan 3.0
Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.
Provider prices can change.
Best for
Built-in audio
Seedance 2.0
Seedance 2.0 generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.
This comparison does not score audio quality.
0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated
Reviewer scores
Scores by category
Wan 3.0 wins 10 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.
Biggest gapPrompt Adherence: Wan 3.0 ahead by 7.4 points.
Closest categoryObjects: Wan 3.0 ahead by 0.5 points.
Head-to-head scores
13 categories rated head-to-head
Seedance 2.0Wan 3.0
Physics
66.5
71.8
Prompt Adherence
87.4
94.7
Logic Consistency
80.9
78.2
Scene Consistency
92.2
92.9
Cinematography
68.6
72.9
Taste
63.2
68.1
2D Animation
66.7
70.0
3D Animation
70.0
76.0
Human
82.2
86.7
Actor Performance
66.7
66.0
Objects
98.2
98.7
Animals
80.0
84.3
Text Fidelity
85.8
82.5
