Megaton
#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2▲$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0
#3▼$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4▲$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro
#5▼$0.15/sBlack Forest LabsFLUX 3

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamOctober 2, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
Kling 3 Standard evaluation example
Kling 3 Standard
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 3 Standard

69.6Overall score
Rank
#12
Price per minute
$8.40/min
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.7Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 12.1 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 52.2 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $8.40/min for Kling 3 Standard.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Kling 3 Standard

Kling 3 Standard generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
October 2, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins 12 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Wan 3.0 ahead by 52.2 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: Kling 3 Standard ahead by 2.8 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Kling 3 StandardWan 3.0
Physics
57.6
71.8
Prompt Adherence
82.9
94.9
Logic Consistency
66.4
78.2
Scene Consistency
82.2
93.0
Cinematography
75.7
72.9
Taste
63.1
68.1
2D Animation
46.4
70.0
3D Animation
66.0
76.0
Human
79.6
86.7
Actor Performance
59.0
66.0
Objects
90.0
98.7
Animals
71.4
84.3
Text Fidelity
30.3
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Kling 3 Standard detailsSee full Wan 3.0 details
CapabilityKling 3 StandardWan 3.0
Text inputYesUnlisted
Image inputYesUnlisted
Video inputNoUnlisted
Audio inputNoUnlisted
Image outputNoUnlisted
Audio outputYesUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is Kling 3 Standard better than Wan 3.0?

Not on our scores — Wan 3.0 edges ahead overall, 81.7 to 69.6, winning 12 of 13 rated categories. Kling 3 Standard still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is Kling 3 Standard cheaper than Wan 3.0?

No — Wan 3.0 is the cheaper option at $1.95/min, versus $8.40/min for Kling 3 Standard.

Does Kling 3 Standard generate audio?

Yes — Kling 3 Standard generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 52.2 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 23.6 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 14.1 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for animals?

Wan 3.0 leads animals, by 12.9 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 12.0 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 11.8 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 10.8 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 10.0 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for objects?

Wan 3.0 leads objects, by 8.7 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Wan 3.0 better for human?

Wan 3.0 leads human, by 7.0 points.

How are Kling 3 Standard and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

Kling 3 Standard

Wan 3.0

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba74.0 / 82.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba73.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 87.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI70.0 / 78.0
P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba66.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 3 StandardBlack Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 70.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 3 StandardGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 70.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 3 StandardKling AI (Kuaishou)Kling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 70.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs MiniMax Hailuo 03Kling AI (Kuaishou)MiniMax70.0 / 75.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Kling 3 Standardfal.aiKling AI (Kuaishou)74.0 / 70.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Kling 3 StandardMiniMaxKling AI (Kuaishou)73.0 / 70.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Kling 3 StandardGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)70.0 / 70.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI70.0 / 66.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google70.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway70.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Standard vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks70.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 87.0

Methodology

How we tested Kling 3 Standard and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from October 2, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports