Our verdict
Wan 3.0 leads
Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.
Kling AI (Kuaishou)
Kling 3 Standard
69.4Overall score
- Rank
- #10
- Price per minute
- $8.40/min
Alibaba
Wan 3.0
81.6Overall score
- Rank
- #2
- Price per minute
- $1.95/min
Best for
Highest overall score
Wan 3.0
Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 12.2 points.
The overall score does not measure file reliability.
Best for
More readable text
Wan 3.0
Wan 3.0 leads by 52.2 points.
Long or moving text still needs manual review.
Best for
Lower generation cost
Wan 3.0
Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $8.40/min for Kling 3 Standard.
Provider prices can change.
Best for
Built-in audio
Kling 3 Standard
Kling 3 Standard generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.
This comparison does not score audio quality.
0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated
Reviewer scores
Scores by category
Wan 3.0 wins 12 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.
Biggest gapText Fidelity: Wan 3.0 ahead by 52.2 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: Kling 3 Standard ahead by 2.8 points.
Head-to-head scores
13 categories rated head-to-head
Kling 3 StandardWan 3.0
Physics
57.6
71.8
Prompt Adherence
82.6
94.7
Logic Consistency
66.4
78.2
Scene Consistency
82.5
92.9
Cinematography
75.7
72.9
Taste
63.1
68.1
2D Animation
46.4
70.0
3D Animation
66.0
76.0
Human
79.6
86.7
Actor Performance
59.0
66.0
Objects
89.9
98.7
Animals
71.4
84.3
Text Fidelity
30.3
82.5
