#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2▲$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0
#3▼$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4▲$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro
#5▼$0.15/sBlack Forest LabsFLUX 3

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

P-Video 2 Pro vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamOctober 2, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
P-Video 2 Pro evaluation example
P-Video 2 Pro
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0

Affiliate link: Megaton may earn a commission if you purchase, at no extra cost to you.

Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Pruna AI

Pruna AI

P-Video 2 Pro

77.5Overall score
Rank
#4
Price per minute
$2.25/min
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.7Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 4.1 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

P-Video 2 Pro

P-Video 2 Pro leads by 0.8 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $2.25/min for P-Video 2 Pro.

Provider prices can change.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
October 2, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins 6 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapObjects: Wan 3.0 ahead by 11.8 points.
Closest categoryAnimals: level

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0
Physics
67.7
71.8
Prompt Adherence
87.1
94.9
Logic Consistency
70.0
78.2
Scene Consistency
86.9
93.0
Cinematography
77.1
72.9
Taste
68.3
68.1
2D Animation
70.0
70.0
3D Animation
80.0
76.0
Human
80.7
86.7
Actor Performance
71.0
66.0
Objects
86.9
98.7
Animals
84.3
84.3
Text Fidelity
83.3
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityP-Video 2 ProWan 3.0
Text inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image inputUnlistedUnlisted
Video inputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image outputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio outputUnlistedUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is P-Video 2 Pro better than Wan 3.0?

Not on our scores — Wan 3.0 edges ahead overall, 81.7 to 77.5, winning 6 of 13 rated categories. P-Video 2 Pro still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is P-Video 2 Pro cheaper than Wan 3.0?

No — Wan 3.0 is the cheaper option at $1.95/min, versus $2.25/min for P-Video 2 Pro.

Does P-Video 2 Pro generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for P-Video 2 Pro yet.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for objects?

Wan 3.0 leads objects, by 11.8 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 8.2 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 7.8 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 6.1 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for human?

Wan 3.0 leads human, by 5.9 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for actor performance?

P-Video 2 Pro leads actor performance, by 5.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for cinematography?

P-Video 2 Pro leads cinematography, by 4.3 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 4.1 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

P-Video 2 Pro leads 3d animation, by 4.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

P-Video 2 Pro leads text fidelity, by 0.8 points.

How are P-Video 2 Pro and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.0Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs P-Video 2 ProBlack Forest LabsPruna AI77.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs P-Video 2 ProGooglePruna AI76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba74.0 / 82.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba73.0 / 82.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs P-Video 2 ProMiniMaxPruna AI75.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba70.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs P-Video 2 Profal.aiPruna AI74.0 / 78.0
H3 Max Turbo vs P-Video 2 ProMiniMaxPruna AI73.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba70.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs P-Video 2 ProGooglePruna AI70.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI70.0 / 78.0
P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba66.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.0 MiniPruna AIByteDance78.0 / 69.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 vs P-Video 2 ProPruna AIPruna AI66.0 / 78.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Veo 3.1Pruna AIGoogle78.0 / 63.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Gen-4.5Pruna AIRunway78.0 / 61.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs P-Video 2 ProLightricksPruna AI52.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0

Methodology

How we tested P-Video 2 Pro and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from October 2, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.