Megaton
#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5 report
#2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 4.0 report
#3▼$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0 report
#4▲$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0 report
#5▼$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro report

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Kling 4.0 vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamNovember 3, 2026

Kling 4.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
Kling 4.0 evaluation example
Kling 4.0
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Try Kling 4.0
Try Wan 3.0

Affiliate link: Megaton may earn a commission if you purchase, at no extra cost to you.

Our verdict

Kling 4.0 leads

Kling 4.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 4.0

83.8Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
Unavailable
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.7Overall score
Rank
#3
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Kling 4.0

Kling 4.0 leads the overall score by 2.2 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 9.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
November 3, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Kling 4.0 wins 8 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapActor Performance: Kling 4.0 ahead by 14.0 points.
Closest categoryTaste: level

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Kling 4.0Wan 3.0
Physics
75.3
71.8
Prompt Adherence
90.4
94.9
Logic Consistency
80.9
78.2
Scene Consistency
96.8
93.0
Cinematography
72.9
72.9
Taste
68.1
68.1
2D Animation
79.2
70.0
3D Animation
84.0
76.0
Human
91.8
86.7
Actor Performance
80.0
66.0
Objects
92.5
98.7
Animals
92.9
84.3
Text Fidelity
73.2
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Kling 4.0 detailsSee full Wan 3.0 details
CapabilityKling 4.0Wan 3.0
Text inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image inputUnlistedUnlisted
Video inputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image outputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio outputUnlistedUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is Kling 4.0 better than Wan 3.0?

Overall, yes. Kling 4.0 scores 83.8 to Wan 3.0's 81.7 and wins 8 of 13 rated categories. Wan 3.0 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is Kling 4.0 cheaper than Wan 3.0?

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min; we don't have public pricing for Kling 4.0 to compare directly.

Does Kling 4.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Kling 4.0 yet.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for actor performance?

Kling 4.0 leads actor performance, by 14.0 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 9.3 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for 2d animation?

Kling 4.0 leads 2d animation, by 9.2 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for animals?

Kling 4.0 leads animals, by 8.6 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

Kling 4.0 leads 3d animation, by 8.0 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for objects?

Wan 3.0 leads objects, by 6.2 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for human?

Kling 4.0 leads human, by 5.2 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 4.5 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for scene consistency?

Kling 4.0 leads scene consistency, by 3.8 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Wan 3.0 better for physics?

Kling 4.0 leads physics, by 3.5 points.

How are Kling 4.0 and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

Kling 4.0

Wan 3.0

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance84.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance84.0 / 78.0
Kling 4.0 vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI84.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 4.0Black Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 84.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 4.0GoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 84.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 4.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 84.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03Kling AI (Kuaishou)MiniMax84.0 / 75.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Kling 4.0fal.aiKling AI (Kuaishou)74.0 / 84.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Kling 4.0MiniMaxKling AI (Kuaishou)73.0 / 84.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba74.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Kling 4.0GoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)71.0 / 84.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba73.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba71.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Kling 4.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling AI (Kuaishou)70.0 / 84.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance84.0 / 69.0
Kling 4.0 vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI84.0 / 66.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google84.0 / 62.0
P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba66.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway84.0 / 60.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba62.0 / 82.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba60.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks84.0 / 52.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0

Methodology

How we tested Kling 4.0 and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from November 3, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports