Megaton
#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5 report
#2▲$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0 report
#3▼$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0 report
#4▲$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro report
#5▼$0.15/sBlack Forest LabsFLUX 3 report

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamOctober 2, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
Kling 3 Pro evaluation example
Kling 3 Pro
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 3 Pro

75.6Overall score
Rank
#7
Price per minute
$8.40/min
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.7Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 6.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 58.2 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $8.40/min for Kling 3 Pro.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Kling 3 Pro

Kling 3 Pro generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
October 2, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins 11 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Wan 3.0 ahead by 58.2 points.
Closest categoryPhysics: Wan 3.0 ahead by 1.8 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Kling 3 ProWan 3.0
Physics
70.0
71.8
Prompt Adherence
84.8
94.9
Logic Consistency
76.4
78.2
Scene Consistency
90.2
93.0
Cinematography
67.1
72.9
Taste
65.8
68.1
2D Animation
59.2
70.0
3D Animation
58.0
76.0
Human
90.0
86.7
Actor Performance
78.0
66.0
Objects
89.7
98.7
Animals
80.0
84.3
Text Fidelity
24.3
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Kling 3 Pro detailsSee full Wan 3.0 details
CapabilityKling 3 ProWan 3.0
Text inputYesUnlisted
Image inputYesUnlisted
Video inputNoUnlisted
Audio inputNoUnlisted
Image outputNoUnlisted
Audio outputYesUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is Kling 3 Pro better than Wan 3.0?

Not on our scores — Wan 3.0 edges ahead overall, 81.7 to 75.6, winning 11 of 13 rated categories. Kling 3 Pro still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is Kling 3 Pro cheaper than Wan 3.0?

No — Wan 3.0 is the cheaper option at $1.95/min, versus $8.40/min for Kling 3 Pro.

Does Kling 3 Pro generate audio?

Yes — Kling 3 Pro generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 58.2 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 18.0 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for actor performance?

Kling 3 Pro leads actor performance, by 12.0 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 10.8 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 10.1 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for objects?

Wan 3.0 leads objects, by 9.0 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for cinematography?

Wan 3.0 leads cinematography, by 5.7 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for animals?

Wan 3.0 leads animals, by 4.3 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for human?

Kling 3 Pro leads human, by 3.3 points.

Is Kling 3 Pro or Wan 3.0 better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 2.8 points.

How are Kling 3 Pro and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

Kling 3 Pro

Wan 3.0

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 87.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba74.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 3 ProBlack Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 76.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba73.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 3 ProGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 76.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs MiniMax Hailuo 03Kling AI (Kuaishou)MiniMax76.0 / 75.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Kling 3 Profal.aiKling AI (Kuaishou)74.0 / 76.0
P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba66.0 / 82.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Kling 3 ProMiniMaxKling AI (Kuaishou)73.0 / 76.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Kling 3 ProGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)70.0 / 76.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 3 StandardKling AI (Kuaishou)Kling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 70.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Pro vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI76.0 / 66.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Pro vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks76.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 87.0

Methodology

How we tested Kling 3 Pro and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from October 2, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports