Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

<report>

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 3 Pro

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Generated via Kling · August 5, 2026Evaluated · August 9, 2026Leaderboard rank #6 of 15Last updated · September 10, 2026

75.51

/ 100

Add as preferred source
Get the latest video releases and leaderboard updates

Categories

Weight
C01Prompt Adherence20%84.67C02Scene Consistency10%90.15C03Physics20%70.00C04Human Fidelity10%90.00C052D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%59.17C063D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%58.00C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry2.5%67.14C08Taste & Art Direction6.5%65.83C09Animal & Creature Fidelity1.5%80.00C10Object & Product Fidelity1.5%89.72C11Causal & Semantic Coherence7.5%76.36C12Text Fidelity1.5%24.26C13Character Performance & Acting1.5%78.00C15Quality + Reliability2%81.36

Get the full report

Get the Kling 3 Pro test results, reviewer notes, and model comparisons.

Are you part of the Kling AI (Kuaishou) team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
View paid access →Request a complimentary full report →

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

84.7

40 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Prompt requirements are fulfilled reliably across the set, with only isolated misses or ambiguities.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential20
Major24
Minor31

40 videos

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

96.5

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time with near-complete consistency.

This Category

90.2

36 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent across nearly all evaluated videos.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major1
Minor0
This Category
Essential15
Major14
Minor7

36 videos

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended physical event is recognizable, but repeated important defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

70.0

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Motion and interaction are convincing overall, with recurring but non-disruptive physical anomalies.

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

Fully convincing within the requested style, with no meaningful uncanny or anatomical defects.

This Category

90.0

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human anatomy, identity, surfaces, and motion remain convincing across nearly all evaluated videos.

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Technically excellent and fully professional, but more conventional or less expressive than the highest tier.

This Category

59.2

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The requested medium remains recognizable, but technical and expressive quality is uneven across the set.

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended 3D animation is recognizable, but repeated technical or expressive defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

58.0

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended 3D animation remains recognizable, but technical and expressive quality is uneven.

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent and competent but synthetic, mechanical, or visually underdeveloped.

This Category

67.1

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Cinematography is generally coherent and capable, but mechanical or underdeveloped visual choices recur.

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Competent but visibly reliant on familiar AI aesthetics or underdeveloped art direction.

This Category

65.8

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Art direction is generally capable, but generic, unresolved, or less-confident choices recur.

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, anatomically strained, or behaviorally unnatural.

This Category

80.0

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Animal and creature fidelity is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

89.7

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Object and product fidelity is highly reliable, with only isolated detail or material failures.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential3
Major5
Minor0

8 videos

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

The event remains understandable, but noticeable contradictions appear.

This Category

76.4

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Events remain clear overall, though recurring logical irregularities are visible but bounded.

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability with near-complete consistency.

This Category

24.3

6 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Severe spelling, legibility, placement, attachment, or temporal failures dominate much of the set.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential35
Major10
Minor0

6 videos

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Professional, clear, and convincing, but more conventional or less nuanced.

This Category

78.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Performances are professional and convincing overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less nuanced.

<comparisons>

Differences within model family

Megatonmegaton.ai
CategoryKling 3 Standard
C01-2.0
C03-12.4
C02-7.7
C04-10.4
C05-12.8
C06+8.0
C11-10.0
C08-2.8
C07+8.6
C09-8.6
C10+0.3
C12+6.0
C13-19.0
Essential · -19.0Major · 0Minor · +19.0

Differences between other models

Megatonmegaton.ai

C01Prompt Adherence

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C03Physics

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C02Scene Consistency

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C04Human Fidelity

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C052D Animation Craft & Artistry

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C063D Animation Craft & Artistry

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C11Causal & Semantic Coherence

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C08Taste & Art Direction

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C09Animal & Creature Fidelity

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C10Object & Product Fidelity

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C12Text Fidelity

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
Megatonmegaton.ai

C13Character Performance & Acting

Kling 3FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
CategoryKling 3 ProFLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiniMax Hailuo 03MiniMax H3 Max
C01Prompt Adherence84.787.187.290.392.9
C03Physics70.070.658.256.554.7
C02Scene Consistency90.294.888.890.280.3
C04Human Fidelity90.073.787.084.472.2
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry59.260.464.657.573.3
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry58.066.076.067.572.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence76.480.972.777.375.5
C08Taste & Art Direction65.865.065.365.265.8
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry67.171.468.678.678.6
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity80.075.787.172.980.0
C10Object & Product Fidelity89.783.899.281.793.5
C12Text Fidelity24.382.492.190.081.8
C13Character Performance & Acting78.068.074.063.062.0

Leaderboard

Megatonmegaton.ai
Megaton

Video Index

Measuring video model quality and performance

Video Index · 0–100

Scores are from the active Megaton v-benchmark v2.0 publication. See how our scores are calculated in our Methodology.

<Cite this report>

Citation snippet

Copy a plain-text citation for articles and research.

Megaton. “Kling 3 Pro V-Benchmark v2 report.” V-Benchmark results publication 1.4.0, September 10, 2026. https://megaton.ai/evaluations/kling/kling-3-pro/report

Report badge

The badge links to this report so readers can verify the ranking.

Kling 3 Pro is ranked #6 in Megaton V-Benchmark v2

Methodology

Our score is based on our v-benchmark v2 methodology.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Published
August 11, 2026
V-Benchmark version
2.1.0
Megaton Index
75.51
Published rank
6 of 15
View model changelog →

<What you get>

  • The prompts and outputs used in our tests.
  • Scores and notes explaining each result.
  • Comparisons with other models and versions.

<Who can get access>

  • Are you part of the Kling AI (Kuaishou) team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
  • University and nonprofit researchers can ask about research access.
  • Paid access starts at $2,500 per report.
Access option

We’ll use these details to reply to your request.