Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0 Mini

By Megaton TeamSeptember 1, 2026

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
LTX 2.3 22B evaluation example
LTX 2.3 22B
Seedance 2.0 Mini evaluation example
Seedance 2.0 Mini
Our verdict

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Lightricks

Lightricks

LTX 2.3 22B

51.8Overall score
Rank
#14
Price per minute
$2.13/min
ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0 Mini

68.7Overall score
Rank
#11
Price per minute
$4.54/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Seedance 2.0 Mini

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads the overall score by 16.9 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Seedance 2.0 Mini

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads by 52.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

LTX 2.3 22B

LTX 2.3 22B runs $2.13/min, against $4.54/min for Seedance 2.0 Mini.

Provider prices can change.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Seedance 2.0 Mini wins all 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Seedance 2.0 Mini ahead by 52.3 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: Seedance 2.0 Mini ahead by 8.6 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

LTX 2.3 22BSeedance 2.0 Mini
Physics
40.0
50.6
Prompt Adherence
73.0
87.7
Logic Consistency
46.4
70.9
Scene Consistency
64.2
78.0
Cinematography
58.6
67.1
Taste
42.0
60.7
2D Animation
33.3
61.7
3D Animation
42.5
62.0
Human
50.7
64.8
Actor Performance
41.0
63.0
Objects
48.3
88.4
Animals
44.3
82.9
Text Fidelity
11.6
63.8

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full LTX 2.3 22B detailsSee full Seedance 2.0 Mini details
CapabilityLTX 2.3 22BSeedance 2.0 Mini
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputYesYes
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is LTX 2.3 22B better than Seedance 2.0 Mini?

Not on our scores — Seedance 2.0 Mini edges ahead overall, 68.7 to 51.8, winning 13 of 13 rated categories. LTX 2.3 22B still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is LTX 2.3 22B cheaper than Seedance 2.0 Mini?

Yes. LTX 2.3 22B runs $2.13/min, against $4.54/min for Seedance 2.0 Mini.

Which makes longer clips, LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini?

Seedance 2.0 Mini — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 5 seconds for LTX 2.3 22B.

Does LTX 2.3 22B generate audio?

Yes — LTX 2.3 22B generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does Seedance 2.0 Mini generate audio?

Yes — Seedance 2.0 Mini generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for text fidelity?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads text fidelity, by 52.3 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for objects?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads objects, by 40.2 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for animals?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads animals, by 38.6 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for 2d animation?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads 2d animation, by 28.3 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for logic consistency?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads logic consistency, by 24.5 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for actor performance?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads actor performance, by 22.0 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for 3d animation?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads 3d animation, by 19.5 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for taste?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads taste, by 18.7 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for prompt adherence?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads prompt adherence, by 14.8 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for human?

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads human, by 14.1 points.

How are LTX 2.3 22B and Seedance 2.0 Mini tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

LTX 2.3 22B

Seedance 2.0 Mini

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance69.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 69.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniBlack Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.5LightricksByteDance52.0 / 87.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance76.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0LightricksAlibaba52.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0LightricksByteDance52.0 / 78.0
FLUX 3 vs LTX 2.3 22BBlack Forest LabsLightricks77.0 / 52.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniMiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks76.0 / 52.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Seedance 2.0 Minifal.aiByteDance75.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance70.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Pro vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks76.0 / 52.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance69.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs MiniMax Hailuo 03LightricksMiniMax52.0 / 75.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs LTX 2.3 22Bfal.aiLightricks75.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks70.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle69.0 / 63.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniRunwayByteDance61.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Standard vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks69.0 / 52.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Veo 3.1LightricksGoogle52.0 / 63.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Gen-4.5LightricksRunway52.0 / 61.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.5GoogleByteDance76.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0

Methodology

How we tested LTX 2.3 22B and Seedance 2.0 Mini

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 1, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.