<report>

Google

Gemini Omni Flash

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Generated via Google · August 5, 2026Evaluated · August 9, 2026Leaderboard rank #10 of 15Last updated · September 10, 2026

70.21

/ 100

Get the latest video releases and leaderboard updates

Get the full report

Get the Gemini Omni Flash test results, reviewer notes, and model comparisons.

Are you part of the Google team? Please reach out for complimentary access.

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

90.5

58 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Across the evaluated prompts, explicit subjects, actions, relationships, negations, and required text are fulfilled with near-complete consistency.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential18
Major20
Minor17

58 videos

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time with near-complete consistency.

This Category

81.1

58 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Temporal and spatial continuity is highly reliable, with only isolated drift or regeneration.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential40
Major25
Minor17

58 videos

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Believable at first viewing, with clear physical defects on inspection.

This Category

58.8

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended physical events are recognizable, but repeated defects leave overall performance uneven.

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, uncanny, or anatomically strained.

This Category

73.6

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human fidelity is strong overall, with recurring but non-disruptive issues.

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

10.0

This Video · Assessment

The result does not meaningfully function or read as the requested 2D animation.

This Category

42.5

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Coherent 2D craft appears only in some cases; line, timing, pose, or medium-authenticity failures recur frequently.

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

55.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, mechanical, stiff, or underdeveloped.

This Category

62.0

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

3D animation is generally coherent, but synthetic, mechanical, stiff, or underdeveloped execution recurs.

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent and competent but synthetic, mechanical, or visually underdeveloped.

This Category

72.9

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Shot design is technically strong overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less expressive.

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Polished, professional, and coherent, but more conventional or less distinctive.

This Category

59.8

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Successful choices are mixed with repeated inconsistency or familiar AI aesthetics.

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended animal or creature is clearly recognizable, but repeated anatomical or behavioral defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

75.7

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Fidelity is strong overall, with recurring but non-disruptive anatomical or behavioral issues.

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

93.5

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

99.0

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested objects preserve identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

Violations

This Video
Essential1
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential1
Major0
Minor1

8 videos

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

30.0

This Video · Assessment

Severe causal, role, or state-transition failures.

This Category

62.7

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Central events are generally understandable, but strained or unexplained actions and relationships recur.

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability with near-complete consistency.

This Category

76.3

6 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested text remains correct and stable overall, though recurring secondary typography or motion issues are visible.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential6
Major5
Minor0

6 videos

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Believable overall, with visible limitations in timing, expression, or specificity.

This Category

63.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Acting is generally believable, but synthetic timing, expression, attention, or specificity recurs.

Differences between other models

Megatonmegaton.ai

C01Prompt Adherence

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C03Physics

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C02Scene Consistency

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C04Human Fidelity

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C052D Animation Craft & Artistry

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C063D Animation Craft & Artistry

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C11Causal & Semantic Coherence

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C08Taste & Art Direction

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C09Animal & Creature Fidelity

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C10Object & Product Fidelity

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C12Text Fidelity

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
Megatonmegaton.ai

C13Character Performance & Acting

Gemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
CategoryGemini Omni FlashMiniMax H3 MaxH3 Max TurboKling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
C01Prompt Adherence90.592.987.582.687.7
C03Physics58.854.750.657.650.6
C02Scene Consistency81.180.384.782.578.0
C04Human Fidelity73.672.275.979.664.8
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry42.573.375.046.461.7
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry62.072.074.066.062.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence62.775.569.166.470.9
C08Taste & Art Direction59.865.866.163.160.7
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry72.978.674.375.767.1
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity75.780.081.471.482.9
C10Object & Product Fidelity99.093.585.890.088.4
C12Text Fidelity76.381.880.030.363.8
C13Character Performance & Acting63.062.069.059.063.0

Leaderboard

Megatonmegaton.ai
Megaton

Video Index

Measuring video model quality and performance

Video Index · 0–100

Scores are from the active Megaton v-benchmark v2.0 publication. See how our scores are calculated in our Methodology.

<Cite this report>

Citation snippet

Copy a plain-text citation for articles and research.

Megaton. “Gemini Omni Flash V-Benchmark v2 report.” V-Benchmark results publication 1.4.0, September 10, 2026. https://megaton.ai/evaluations/google/gemini-omni-flash-preview/report

Report badge

The badge links to this report so readers can verify the ranking.

Gemini Omni Flash is ranked #10 in Megaton V-Benchmark v2

Methodology

Our score is based on our v-benchmark v2 methodology.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Published
August 11, 2026
V-Benchmark version
2.1.0
Megaton Index
70.21
Published rank
10 of 15
View model changelog →

<What you get>

  • The prompts and outputs used in our tests.
  • Scores and notes explaining each result.
  • Comparisons with other models and versions.

<Who can get access>

  • Are you part of the Google team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
  • University and nonprofit researchers can ask about research access.
  • Paid access starts at $2,500 per report.
Access option

We’ll use these details to reply to your request.