Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1

Overall, yes. Seedance 2.0 Mini scores 68.6 to Veo 3.1's 62.6 and wins 10 of 13 rated categories. Veo 3.1 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Yes. Seedance 2.0 Mini runs $4.54/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Seedance 2.0 Mini — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 8 seconds for Veo 3.1.

Yes — Seedance 2.0 Mini generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads text fidelity, by 22.1 points.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads animals, by 15.7 points.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads 2d animation, by 14.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads 3d animation, by 13.0 points.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads taste, by 8.7 points.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads prompt adherence, by 8.3 points.

Veo 3.1 leads objects, by 7.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads logic consistency, by 5.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 Mini leads physics, by 5.3 points.

Veo 3.1 leads scene consistency, by 2.0 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.