Megaton
#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2▲$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0
#3▼$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4▲$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro
#5▼$0.15/sBlack Forest LabsFLUX 3

Swipe for more top models

<report>

Pruna AI

P-Video 2 Pro

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Generated via Segmind · October 1, 2026Evaluated · October 2, 2026Leaderboard rank #4 of 17Last updated · October 2, 2026

77.53

/ 100

Add as preferred source

<Our Take>

P-Video 2 Pro demonstrates high taste, great 2D animation craftsmanship given its speed and cost. It's a solid recommend and is our highest ranked model post trained on MiniMax's H3.

Categories

Weight
C01Prompt Adherence20%87.07C02Scene Consistency10%86.86C03Physics20%67.65C04Human Fidelity10%80.74C052D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%70.00C063D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%80.00C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry2.5%77.14C08Taste & Art Direction6.5%68.33C09Animal & Creature Fidelity1.5%84.29C10Object & Product Fidelity1.5%86.88C11Causal & Semantic Coherence7.5%70.00C12Text Fidelity1.5%83.33C13Character Performance & Acting1.5%71.00C14Quality + Reliability2.5%82.97

Get the full report

Get the P-Video 2 Pro test results, reviewer notes, and model comparisons.

Are you part of the Pruna AI team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
View paid access →Request a complimentary full report →

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

95.5

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

87.1

36 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Prompt requirements are fulfilled reliably across the set, with only isolated misses or ambiguities.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor1
This Category
Essential10
Major17
Minor12

36 videos

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time with near-complete consistency.

This Category

86.9

36 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Temporal and spatial continuity is highly reliable, with only isolated drift or regeneration.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential17
Major9
Minor4

36 videos

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Believable at first viewing, with clear physical defects on inspection.

This Category

67.7

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Physical behavior is generally coherent, but visible synthetic or strained motion recurs across multiple cases.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, uncanny, or anatomically strained.

This Category

80.7

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human rendering is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Technically excellent and fully professional, but more conventional or less expressive than the highest tier.

This Category

70.0

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The work is strongly and convincingly 2D overall, though execution or authorship is less consistent than the highest tier.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended 3D animation is recognizable, but repeated technical or expressive defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

80.0

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

3D animation is consistently professional and expressive, with only isolated limitations.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Technically excellent and fully professional, but more conventional or less expressive.

This Category

77.1

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Shot design is technically strong overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less expressive.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Competent but visibly reliant on familiar AI aesthetics or underdeveloped art direction.

This Category

68.3

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Art direction is generally capable, but generic, unresolved, or less-confident choices recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

90.0

This Video · Assessment

Highly convincing, with one very small localized defect.

This Category

84.3

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Animal and creature fidelity is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

86.9

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Object and product fidelity is highly reliable, with only isolated detail or material failures.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential5
Major3
Minor2

8 videos

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Clear overall, with a few non-disruptive logical irregularities.

This Category

70.0

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Events remain clear overall, though recurring logical irregularities are visible but bounded.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability with near-complete consistency.

This Category

83.3

6 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Text fidelity is highly reliable, with only isolated content, placement, or temporal defects.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential5
Major4
Minor1

6 videos

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Professional, clear, and convincing, but more conventional or less nuanced.

This Category

71.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Performances are professional and convincing overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less nuanced.

Models that scored similarly on this category

<comparisons>

Differences within model family

Megatonmegaton.ai
CategoryP-Video 2
C01-12.9
C03-9.4
C02-7.3
C04+0.4
C05-31.7
C06-17.5
C11-7.3
C08-6.1
C07+1.4
C09-17.2
C10-27.1
C12-62.8
C130.0
Essential · -62.8Major · 0Minor · +62.8

Differences between other models

Megatonmegaton.ai

C01Prompt Adherence

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C03Physics

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C02Scene Consistency

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C04Human Fidelity

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C052D Animation Craft & Artistry

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C063D Animation Craft & Artistry

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C11Causal & Semantic Coherence

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C08Taste & Art Direction

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C09Animal & Creature Fidelity

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C10Object & Product Fidelity

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C12Text Fidelity

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Megatonmegaton.ai

C13Character Performance & Acting

P-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
CategoryP-Video 2 ProWan 3.0Seedance 2.0FLUX 3Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
C01Prompt Adherence87.194.987.686.988.6
C03Physics67.771.866.570.658.2
C02Scene Consistency86.993.092.394.888.6
C04Human Fidelity80.786.782.273.787.0
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry70.070.066.760.464.6
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry80.076.070.066.076.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence70.078.280.980.972.7
C08Taste & Art Direction68.368.163.265.065.3
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry77.172.968.671.468.6
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity84.384.380.075.787.1
C10Object & Product Fidelity86.998.798.283.899.2
C12Text Fidelity83.382.585.882.492.1
C13Character Performance & Acting71.066.066.768.074.0

Leaderboard

Megatonmegaton.ai
Megaton

Video Index

Measuring video model quality and performance

Video Index · 0–100

Scores are from the active Megaton v-benchmark v2.0 publication. See how our scores are calculated in our Methodology.

<Cite this report>

Citation snippet

Copy a plain-text citation for articles and research.

Megaton. “P-Video 2 Pro V-Benchmark v2 report.” V-Benchmark results publication 1.6.0, October 2, 2026. https://megaton.ai/evaluations/pruna/p-video-2-pro/report

Report badge

The badge links to this report so readers can verify the ranking.

P-Video 2 Pro is ranked #4 in Megaton V-Benchmark v2

Methodology

Our score is based on our v-benchmark v2 methodology. This is a Core 36 evaluation with 85.4% weighted coverage, not a Full evaluation.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Published
October 2, 2026
V-Benchmark version
2.3.0
Megaton Index
77.53
Published rank
4 of 17
View model changelog →

<What you get>

  • The prompts and outputs used in our tests.
  • Scores and notes explaining each result.
  • Comparisons with other models and versions.

<Who can get access>

  • Are you part of the Pruna AI team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
  • University and nonprofit researchers can ask about research access.
  • Paid access starts at $2,500 per report.
Access option

We’ll use these details to reply to your request.