Swipe for more top models
Compare
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3
Seedance 2.0 outperforms Veo 3 across most metrics, scoring 73 overall versus 60. ByteDance's model excels in cinematography, actor performances, and text rendering, while Veo 3 offers native audio output but struggles with prompt adherence and human rendering.
Seedance 2.0ByteDance | Veo 3Google |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers

Provider
ByteDance
bytedance
ByteDance is the platform that serves Seedance 2.0 requests, pricing, and availability.

Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3 requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Seedance 2.0 scores 68.3 versus Veo 3's 58.2 on physics simulation. Both models handle basic physics reasonably, but Seedance shows more consistent real-world behavior.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 63.4 | 58.2 |
Prompt Comparisons
Physics
Prompt
High-end skincare commercial macro, slow push-in on a cream-colored cosmetic tube laid diagonally on a glass surface flooded with fresh white foam and pooling water, its black label reading "Lumae Calming Cleanser" standing crisp and unblurred as suds churn around it. Bubbles rise, water beads slide along the tube, gentle daylight rakes across the glossy plastic. Each character of the typeface remains intact and proportionate throughout, glassy clinical-meets-natural styling.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Physics
Prompt
Surrealist cinematic locked wide, foreground a single small white rabbit sitting perfectly still in a hayfield, ears twitching as a tall white farmhouse behind it is engulfed in large flames. Tiny paper flecks drift, the rabbit ignores them, grass swaying in the warm draft. Saturated 35mm film grade, painterly composition, impossible calm.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Tilt-shift miniature-style cinematic shot, medium frame of a small toy figure in a white tee carefully pushing a rounded foam boulder on a steep model hillside, knees braced, hands flat against the textured prop. Tiny pebbles slide past in slow rivulets. Toy-like depth-of-field on the upper and lower thirds, harsh midday sun casting long shadows, the absurd comedy of a single push that never quite arrives.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Seedance 2.0 leads significantly in prompt adherence (76.3 vs 54) and logic consistency (61 vs 53.2). Veo 3 can struggle with logical worldbuilding on creative camera requests.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 78.6 | 54.0 |
| Logic Consistency | 75.9 | 53.2 |
| Scene Consistency | — | 70.7 |
Prompt Comparisons
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Anime walking-shot in the style of a quiet contemporary anime film, low POV camera tracking forward over a dirt road, framing a person's worn sneakers and beige cargo pants stepping in steady rhythm. Ahead, a small valley town spills downhill under a blazing orange sunset streaked with telephone lines and clouds. Painterly clouds with rim-lit edges, hand-drawn dust puffs at each step, the kind of contemplative end-of-day walk that doesn't need narration.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Anime cinematic shot, low-angle hero composition of a young mage in a slate cloak standing center-frame as luminous white energy ribbons spiral up from the moss around his feet and weave through the canopy of a primeval forest. Eyes closed, hands clasped in concentration, robe lifting subtly. Sun shafts piercing the trees, painterly Shinkai sky peeking through, ribbons animating in fluid 2D ink-and-light strokes, the held silence of summoned focus.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Fantasy CG short-film moment, medium close-up of a small wrinkled humanoid in a moss-green robe reaching with quiet reverence toward a floating violet crystal suspended in the boughs of a luminous tree of glass leaves. Fireflies drift between him and the orb, the foliage gently chiming as he extends an open palm. Nebular purple sky, bioluminescent ground flora, painterly volumetrics, the breath-held instant before contact.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Seedance 2.0 dominates cinematography with 84.1 versus Veo 3's 55.9. Veo 3 tends toward a glossier aesthetic, while Seedance delivers more varied cinematic looks.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 74.5 | 55.9 |
| Taste | 40.0 | — |
| Quality | 0.9 | 0.6 |
Prompt Comparisons
Cinematography
Prompt
Extreme wide-angle 16mm-style fisheye, locked-off on the bow of a tall ship as an adult sailor crouches near the camera, the bowsprit and rigging curving around him in distorted arcs, gray Atlantic swell heaving behind. Wind moves his curls, ropes thump against masts. Heavy practical grain, vignetted edges, desaturated blues and bone whites, archival expedition film texture.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Cinematography
Prompt
High-contrast black-and-white aerial, locked overhead shot of a boxing ring with one figure seated low in shadow at the bottom of frame as two opponents circle each other slowly in the bright square below, long shadows pinwheeling. The crowd is invisible blackness beyond the ropes. Single hard top-down light pool, crushed blacks, soft 35mm grain, the choreographed stillness of a Wong Kar-wai standoff.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Human
Prompt
High-fashion editorial motion shot, locked symmetrical frame of a model in a tailored mint flight-attendant uniform leaning against a stack of matching pastel suitcases, fingertips delicately raised, lips painted carmine, eyes tracking imperceptibly toward camera. Background a single saturated mint-green wall. Mid-century travel-poster styling, slow micro-movements, polished commercial lighting, the cool poise of an entire era distilled into one held pose. ---
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Seedance 2.0 outperforms across all animation styles: 2D (69.7 vs 53), 3D (82.5 vs 64), and anime (78 vs 49.7). The gap is especially pronounced in anime-style content.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 70.8 | 53.0 |
| 3D Animation | 65.6 | 64.0 |
| Anime Animation | 65.3 | 49.7 |
Prompt Comparisons
2D Animation
Prompt
Clean 2D hand-painted cartoon animation, locked close framing on a small blue paper kite hanging near an open window in a pastel teal room. A gentle indoor breeze lifts the string, the kite tilts left, then rights itself with soft squash-and-stretch timing. Chalky textures, simple painted shadows, warm afternoon light, one clear beat of quiet wonder.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
3D Animation
Prompt
Stylized CG short, slow push-in on a young ceremonial leader in turquoise and gold ceremonial headwear staring directly down the lens, identical companions in perfect symmetrical formation receding behind her into a sunlit colonnade. Her jaw sets, eyes narrow, and a single geometric earring sways. Hyper-clean feature-animation shader work, soft skin shading, dust motes hanging in shafts of light, the second before a coordinated step forward, no dialogue, just held breath.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
3D Animation
Prompt
Stylized 3D animated sequence, slow tracking shot following a hefty woolly bovine sauntering down a narrow aisle of an antique porcelain boutique, glass shelves crammed with delicate vases on either side. Each heavy footstep makes the floorboards tremble, lamps swaying, a single vase teetering and almost falling. Warm amber gallery lighting, plush carpet underfoot, the held-breath tension of inevitable collision, animated with deliberate weight and timing.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Seedance 2.0 excels in human rendering (69.1 vs 54.7), hands (82.7 vs 50), and actor performances (86 vs 45). Veo 3's actor performances notably regressed from Veo 2.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 77.5 | 54.7 |
| Hands | 81.2 | 50.0 |
| Actor Performance | — | 45.0 |
Prompt Comparisons
Hands
Prompt
Extreme fisheye action-camera lens locked on a studio stunt performer in a white tee barreling through a skyline flying towards camera, hands thrust forward and splayed wide right up against the camera, fingers individually articulated, palm lines and ring catching refracted light.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Anime Animation
Prompt
Cinematic hand-painted anime sequence, wide aerial shot of a young traveler in dark robes standing on the back of a long iridescent serpent dragon as it weaves through a rose-gold dawn sky over rust-red dunes, scales rippling like opal under the sun. The dragon banks gently as its eye glints toward camera. Painterly clouds, soft volumetric backlight, hair and sash whipping in slow wind, the awe of first flight.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Anime Animation
Prompt
Soft slice-of-life anime moment, low-angle medium close-up of two college-aged friends resting in tall grass, one with auburn hair leaning into frame as the breeze moves a loose strand across the other friend’s cheek. He blinks up and smiles quietly. Warm afternoon sun filters through a green canopy, lens flare wisps, painted bokeh of distant hills, the suspended hush of a tender unspoken moment.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Seedance 2.0 leads on animals (78 vs 63.3), while Veo 3 edges ahead on objects (67.6 vs 63.3). This is one of the few areas where Veo 3 shows competitive performance.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 64.6 | 67.6 |
| Animals | 76.0 | 63.3 |
Prompt Comparisons
Objects
Prompt
Editorial fashion commercial shot, slow vertical crane move rising from base level up to eye-level on a deep oxblood-red leather handbag perched on a circular white plinth, gold padlock and tassel swaying delicately as a curtain of cream silk drapery behind it ripples in a gentle off-screen breeze. Warm tungsten film grade, narrow shaft of light caressing the leather grain, museum-like reverence, the quiet drama of a single object held under a single beam.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Objects
Prompt
Graphic-design product shot, locked symmetrical frame of a tall clear glass bottle with vibrant magenta-and-yellow label split exactly between a deep teal and a hot-pink color block backdrop, a single palm leaf casting an animated soft shadow as it sways off-camera. Hard direct sun shifts subtly, gradient highlights tracing the curvature. Memphis-meets-minimalism styling, saturated to the edge of acid, the bottle held like a sculpture under tropical noon. ---
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Objects
Prompt
Hyper-slow-motion macro at 4000fps, frontal close-up of an icy lime cocktail glass as a cascade of crystalline water erupts upward through the rim, droplets suspended in mid-air like glass beads, condensation streaking the sides. Tropical bokeh of turquoise sea and palm fronds dissolves behind. Razor-sharp focus on the splash crown, golden rim of late-afternoon sun, the kind of frozen-time food-commercial moment that lasts a full beat too long.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Seedance 2.0 significantly outperforms on text fidelity (85 vs 42.7). For projects requiring readable on-screen text, Seedance is the clear choice.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 75.9 | 42.7 |
Prompt Comparisons
Text Fidelity
Prompt
Cozy macro tabletop scene, top-down framing on an open hardback storybook resting on a thick knit blanket, the left page bearing illuminated calligraphy reading "Once upon a time, in a kingdom far far away…" as a hand gently turns the page to reveal a watercolor castle on a green hill. Warm bedside lamp glow, dust motes drifting, fingertips brushing the parchment, every letter perfectly legible and consistent through the motion, the storyteller-intimate scale of a hand-painted childhood.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Text Fidelity
Prompt
High-end skincare commercial macro, slow push-in on a cream-colored cosmetic tube laid diagonally on a glass surface flooded with fresh white foam and pooling water, its black label reading "Lumae Calming Cleanser" standing crisp and unblurred as suds churn around it. Bubbles rise, water beads slide along the tube, gentle daylight rakes across the glossy plastic. Each character of the typeface remains intact and proportionate throughout, glassy clinical-meets-natural styling.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Text Fidelity
Prompt
Stylized comic-book animated shot, three-quarter medium framing on a gaunt blue-skinned undead gunslinger in a dust-caked duster, revolver in one hand and crumpled wanted poster in the other reading "WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE — UNDEAD COWBOY — REWARD $10,000" in clean weathered typography. Hot crimson dusk behind, barbed-wire silhouettes, the poster wrinkling as he tightens his grip but every word remaining razor legible. Heavy ink-line aesthetic, Mignola-meets-Mike Allred grit.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Both models are priced identically at $0.20/second ($12/minute). Veo 3 uniquely offers native audio output, while Seedance has notable copyright compliance concerns—it produces more copyrighted content than any tested model.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 | Veo 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.150 | $0.200 |
| Price / min | $9.00 | $12.00 |
| Latency | 0ms | 850ms |
Prompt Comparisons
Objects
Prompt
Luxury commercial product shot, slow 360-degree turntable on a square olive-glass bottle with a brushed amber cap, a single silk ribbon and small ivory label fluttering as the platform rotates. Long soft shadow stretches across the warm beige seamless. Polished beauty lighting, micro-reflections traveling along the glass edges, dust motes catching in a single hair-light, hushed minimalist counter-display elegance, 8K macro precision.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Objects
Prompt
Stylized still-life commercial shot, locked-off on a cream 1980s CRT television set against a sage backdrop, its screen alive with a hand-painted urban garden of vines, miniature towers, and tiny solar panels that subtly animate inside the screen as if the world within is breathing. The plastic housing reflects a faint warm key light, dust hanging in the air. Conceptual museum-piece styling, slight CRT scanline shimmer, the gentle whir of a vacuum tube barely audible.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3
Logic Consistency
Prompt
Photoreal cinematic long take, slow forward dolly down a grand marble hall toward a fully armored knight standing dead center, sword tip resting on the floor, gauntleted hand lifting a glass of red wine in a small toast directly to camera. Crystal chandelier sways gently overhead, crimson cape pooling on polished stone. Anamorphic widescreen, deep aristocratic palette of marble cream and oxblood, the dry comedy of formal manners performed by a tin can.
Seedance 2.0
vs
Veo 3

