Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

LTX 2.3 22B vs Wan 3.0

By Megaton TeamSeptember 1, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
LTX 2.3 22B evaluation example
LTX 2.3 22B
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Lightricks

Lightricks

LTX 2.3 22B

51.8Overall score
Rank
#14
Price per minute
$2.13/min
Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.6Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 29.8 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 70.9 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $2.13/min for LTX 2.3 22B.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

LTX 2.3 22B

LTX 2.3 22B generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins all 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Wan 3.0 ahead by 70.9 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: Wan 3.0 ahead by 14.3 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

LTX 2.3 22BWan 3.0
Physics
40.0
71.8
Prompt Adherence
73.0
94.7
Logic Consistency
46.4
78.2
Scene Consistency
64.2
92.9
Cinematography
58.6
72.9
Taste
42.0
68.1
2D Animation
33.3
70.0
3D Animation
42.5
76.0
Human
50.7
86.7
Actor Performance
41.0
66.0
Objects
48.3
98.7
Animals
44.3
84.3
Text Fidelity
11.6
82.5

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full LTX 2.3 22B detailsSee full Wan 3.0 details
CapabilityLTX 2.3 22BWan 3.0
Text inputYesUnlisted
Image inputYesUnlisted
Video inputYesUnlisted
Audio inputYesUnlisted
Image outputNoUnlisted
Audio outputYesUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is LTX 2.3 22B better than Wan 3.0?

Not on our scores — Wan 3.0 edges ahead overall, 81.6 to 51.8, winning 13 of 13 rated categories. LTX 2.3 22B still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is LTX 2.3 22B cheaper than Wan 3.0?

No — Wan 3.0 is the cheaper option at $1.95/min, versus $2.13/min for LTX 2.3 22B.

Does LTX 2.3 22B generate audio?

Yes — LTX 2.3 22B generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 70.9 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for objects?

Wan 3.0 leads objects, by 50.5 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for animals?

Wan 3.0 leads animals, by 40.0 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 36.7 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for human?

Wan 3.0 leads human, by 35.9 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 33.5 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 31.8 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 31.8 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 28.7 points.

Is LTX 2.3 22B or Wan 3.0 better for taste?

Wan 3.0 leads taste, by 26.1 points.

How are LTX 2.3 22B and Wan 3.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

LTX 2.3 22B

Wan 3.0

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Wan 3.0MiniMaxAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Wan 3.0fal.aiAlibaba75.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba69.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.5LightricksByteDance52.0 / 87.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0LightricksByteDance52.0 / 78.0
FLUX 3 vs LTX 2.3 22BBlack Forest LabsLightricks77.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks76.0 / 52.0
Kling 3 Pro vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks76.0 / 52.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs MiniMax Hailuo 03LightricksMiniMax52.0 / 75.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs LTX 2.3 22Bfal.aiLightricks75.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks70.0 / 52.0
Kling 3 Standard vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks69.0 / 52.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0 MiniLightricksByteDance52.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Veo 3.1LightricksGoogle52.0 / 63.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Gen-4.5LightricksRunway52.0 / 61.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.5GoogleByteDance76.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 87.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0GoogleByteDance76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.5MiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 76.0

Methodology

How we tested LTX 2.3 22B and Wan 3.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 1, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.