Megaton
#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5 report
#2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 4.0 report
#3▼$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0 report
#4▲$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0 report
#5▼$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro report

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Mini

By Megaton TeamNovember 3, 2026

Kling 4.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
Kling 4.0 evaluation example
Kling 4.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini evaluation example
Seedance 2.0 Mini
Try Kling 4.0
Try Seedance 2.0 Mini

Affiliate link: Megaton may earn a commission if you purchase, at no extra cost to you.

Our verdict

Kling 4.0 leads

Kling 4.0 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 4.0

83.8Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
Unavailable
ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0 Mini

68.8Overall score
Rank
#14
Price per minute
$4.54/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Kling 4.0

Kling 4.0 leads the overall score by 15.1 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Kling 4.0

Kling 4.0 leads by 9.3 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Built-in audio

Seedance 2.0 Mini

Seedance 2.0 Mini generates audio with the video; Kling 4.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
November 3, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Kling 4.0 wins all 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapHuman: Kling 4.0 ahead by 27.0 points.
Closest categoryPrompt Adherence: Kling 4.0 ahead by 2.7 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Kling 4.0Seedance 2.0 Mini
Physics
75.3
50.6
Prompt Adherence
90.4
87.7
Logic Consistency
80.9
70.9
Scene Consistency
96.8
78.7
Cinematography
72.9
67.1
Taste
68.1
60.7
2D Animation
79.2
61.7
3D Animation
84.0
62.0
Human
91.8
64.8
Actor Performance
80.0
63.0
Objects
92.5
88.4
Animals
92.9
82.9
Text Fidelity
73.2
63.8

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Kling 4.0 detailsSee full Seedance 2.0 Mini details
CapabilityKling 4.0Seedance 2.0 Mini
Text inputUnlistedYes
Image inputUnlistedYes
Video inputUnlistedYes
Audio inputUnlistedYes
Image outputUnlistedNo
Audio outputUnlistedYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Kling 4.0 better than Seedance 2.0 Mini?

Overall, yes. Kling 4.0 scores 83.8 to Seedance 2.0 Mini's 68.8 and wins 13 of 13 rated categories. Seedance 2.0 Mini can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is Kling 4.0 cheaper than Seedance 2.0 Mini?

Seedance 2.0 Mini runs $4.54/min; we don't have public pricing for Kling 4.0 to compare directly.

Does Kling 4.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Kling 4.0 yet.

Does Seedance 2.0 Mini generate audio?

Yes — Seedance 2.0 Mini generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for human?

Kling 4.0 leads human, by 27.0 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for physics?

Kling 4.0 leads physics, by 24.7 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for 3d animation?

Kling 4.0 leads 3d animation, by 22.0 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for scene consistency?

Kling 4.0 leads scene consistency, by 18.1 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for 2d animation?

Kling 4.0 leads 2d animation, by 17.5 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for actor performance?

Kling 4.0 leads actor performance, by 17.0 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for logic consistency?

Kling 4.0 leads logic consistency, by 10.0 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for animals?

Kling 4.0 leads animals, by 10.0 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for text fidelity?

Kling 4.0 leads text fidelity, by 9.3 points.

Is Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.0 Mini better for taste?

Kling 4.0 leads taste, by 7.4 points.

How are Kling 4.0 and Seedance 2.0 Mini tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

Kling 4.0

Seedance 2.0 Mini

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance84.0 / 87.0
Kling 4.0 vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba84.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance84.0 / 78.0
Kling 4.0 vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI84.0 / 78.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 4.0Black Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 84.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 4.0GoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 84.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 4.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 84.0
Kling 4.0 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03Kling AI (Kuaishou)MiniMax84.0 / 75.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Kling 4.0fal.aiKling AI (Kuaishou)74.0 / 84.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Kling 4.0MiniMaxKling AI (Kuaishou)73.0 / 84.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Kling 4.0GoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)71.0 / 84.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Kling 4.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling AI (Kuaishou)70.0 / 84.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance69.0 / 87.0
Kling 4.0 vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI84.0 / 66.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba69.0 / 82.0
Kling 4.0 vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google84.0 / 62.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 69.0
Kling 4.0 vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway84.0 / 60.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.0 MiniPruna AIByteDance78.0 / 69.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniBlack Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 69.0
Kling 4.0 vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks84.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance76.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 69.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniMiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 69.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Seedance 2.0 Minifal.aiByteDance74.0 / 69.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Seedance 2.0 MiniMiniMaxByteDance73.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance71.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 69.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniPruna AIByteDance66.0 / 69.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle69.0 / 62.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniRunwayByteDance60.0 / 69.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0 MiniLightricksByteDance52.0 / 69.0

Methodology

How we tested Kling 4.0 and Seedance 2.0 Mini

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from November 3, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports