<report>

MiniMax

MiniMax Hailuo 03

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Evaluated · August 11, 2026Leaderboard rank #5 of 11Last updated · August 11, 2026

74.82

/ 100

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

90.3

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Across the evaluated prompts, explicit subjects, actions, relationships, negations, and required text are fulfilled with near-complete consistency.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

81.2

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time very reliably, with only isolated limitations.

This Category

90.2

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent across nearly all evaluated videos.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic or physically strained.

This Category

56.5

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended physical events are recognizable, but repeated defects leave overall performance uneven.

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

Fully convincing within the requested style, with no meaningful uncanny or anatomical defects.

This Category

84.4

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human rendering is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Competent and coherent but visibly synthetic, mechanically interpolated, or artistically underdeveloped.

This Category

57.5

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The requested medium remains recognizable, but technical and expressive quality is uneven across the set.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended 3D animation is recognizable, but repeated technical or expressive defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

67.5

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

3D animation is generally coherent, but synthetic, mechanical, stiff, or underdeveloped execution recurs.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

Masterful, memorable, reference-quality cinematography with exceptional visual authorship.

This Category

78.6

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Shot design is technically strong overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less expressive.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

90.0

This Video · Assessment

Excellent and memorable art direction with highly intentional, sophisticated choices.

This Category

65.3

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Art direction is generally capable, but generic, unresolved, or less-confident choices recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

Fully convincing anatomy, surfaces, movement, and behavior within the requested species or creature design.

This Category

72.9

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Fidelity is strong overall, with recurring but non-disruptive anatomical or behavioral issues.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

81.6

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Object and product fidelity is highly reliable, with only isolated detail or material failures.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

The event remains understandable, but noticeable contradictions appear.

This Category

77.3

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Events remain clear overall, though recurring logical irregularities are visible but bounded.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability with near-complete consistency.

This Category

90.0

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and stability are correct with near-complete consistency.

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Professional, clear, and convincing, but more conventional or less nuanced.

This Category

63.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Acting is generally believable, but synthetic timing, expression, attention, or specificity recurs.

Differences between other models

CategoryMiniMax Hailuo 03FLUX 3Kling 3 ProGemini Omni FlashKling 3 Standard
C01Prompt Adherence90.387.184.790.582.6
C03Physics56.570.670.058.857.6
C02Scene Consistency90.294.890.281.182.5
C04Human Fidelity84.473.790.073.679.6
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry57.560.459.242.544.5
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry67.566.058.062.066.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence77.380.976.462.766.4
C08Taste & Art Direction65.365.065.860.063.3
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry78.671.467.172.975.7
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity72.975.780.075.771.4
C10Object & Product Fidelity81.683.889.799.089.9
C12Text Fidelity90.082.424.376.330.3
C13Character Performance & Acting63.068.078.063.059.0

Leaderboard

Methodology

The Megaton Index is the published 0–100 weighted summary for v-benchmark v2. This public report shows the model's Index and category scores; the full calibration evidence, decision records, and scoring implementation are reserved for the full report.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Videos generated by
MiniMax API on August 11, 2026
Evaluated
August 11, 2026
Benchmark
v-benchmark v2 by Megaton
Publication
1.0.0