LTX 2.3 22B vs Veo 3.1

Not on our scores — Veo 3.1 edges ahead overall, 62.5 to 51.8, winning 13 of 13 rated categories. LTX 2.3 22B still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Yes. LTX 2.3 22B runs $2.13/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Veo 3.1 — up to 8 seconds per clip, versus 5 seconds for LTX 2.3 22B.

Yes — LTX 2.3 22B generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Veo 3.1 leads objects, by 47.3 points.

Veo 3.1 leads text fidelity, by 30.1 points.

Veo 3.1 leads animals, by 22.9 points.

Veo 3.1 leads actor performance, by 21.0 points.

Veo 3.1 leads logic consistency, by 19.1 points.

Veo 3.1 leads scene consistency, by 15.8 points.

Veo 3.1 leads human, by 15.2 points.

Veo 3.1 leads 2d animation, by 13.3 points.

Veo 3.1 leads taste, by 9.7 points.

Veo 3.1 leads 3d animation, by 6.5 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.