V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

FLUX 3 vs LTX 2.3 22B

By Megaton TeamAugust 28, 2026

FLUX 3 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
FLUX 3 evaluation example
FLUX 3
LTX 2.3 22B evaluation example
LTX 2.3 22B
Our verdict

FLUX 3 leads

FLUX 3 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Black Forest Labs

Black Forest Labs

FLUX 3

76.5Overall score
Rank
#3
Price per minute
$9.18/min
Lightricks

Lightricks

LTX 2.3 22B

51.8Overall score
Rank
#13
Price per minute
$2.13/min

Best for

Highest overall score

FLUX 3

FLUX 3 leads the overall score by 24.7 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

FLUX 3

FLUX 3 leads by 70.8 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

LTX 2.3 22B

LTX 2.3 22B runs $2.13/min, against $9.18/min for FLUX 3.

Provider prices can change.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
August 28, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

FLUX 3 wins all 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: FLUX 3 ahead by 70.8 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: FLUX 3 ahead by 12.9 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

FLUX 3LTX 2.3 22B
Physics
70.6
40.0
Prompt Adherence
87.1
73.0
Logic Consistency
80.9
46.4
Scene Consistency
94.8
64.2
Cinematography
71.4
58.6
Taste
65.0
42.0
2D Animation
60.4
33.3
3D Animation
66.0
42.5
Human
73.7
50.7
Actor Performance
68.0
41.0
Objects
83.8
48.3
Animals
75.7
44.3
Text Fidelity
82.4
11.6

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityFLUX 3LTX 2.3 22B
Text inputYesYes
Image inputNoYes
Video inputNoYes
Audio inputNoYes
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is FLUX 3 better than LTX 2.3 22B?

Overall, yes. FLUX 3 scores 76.5 to LTX 2.3 22B's 51.8 and wins 13 of 13 rated categories. LTX 2.3 22B can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is FLUX 3 cheaper than LTX 2.3 22B?

No — LTX 2.3 22B is the cheaper option at $2.13/min, versus $9.18/min for FLUX 3.

Which makes longer clips, FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B?

Both generate clips up to 5 seconds long.

Does FLUX 3 generate audio?

Yes — FLUX 3 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does LTX 2.3 22B generate audio?

Yes — LTX 2.3 22B generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for text fidelity?

FLUX 3 leads text fidelity, by 70.8 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for objects?

FLUX 3 leads objects, by 35.6 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for logic consistency?

FLUX 3 leads logic consistency, by 34.5 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for animals?

FLUX 3 leads animals, by 31.4 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for physics?

FLUX 3 leads physics, by 30.6 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for scene consistency?

FLUX 3 leads scene consistency, by 30.6 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for 2d animation?

FLUX 3 leads 2d animation, by 27.1 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for actor performance?

FLUX 3 leads actor performance, by 27.0 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for 3d animation?

FLUX 3 leads 3d animation, by 23.5 points.

Is FLUX 3 or LTX 2.3 22B better for taste?

FLUX 3 leads taste, by 23.0 points.

How are FLUX 3 and LTX 2.3 22B tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs87.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.0 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs78.0 / 77.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 76.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 3 ProBlack Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 76.0
FLUX 3 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03Black Forest LabsMiniMax77.0 / 75.0
FLUX 3 vs MiniMax H3 MaxBlack Forest Labsfal.ai77.0 / 75.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 70.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 3 StandardBlack Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 69.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniBlack Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 69.0
FLUX 3 vs Veo 3.1Black Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 63.0
Seedance 2.5 vs LTX 2.3 22BByteDanceLightricks87.0 / 52.0
FLUX 3 vs Gen-4.5Black Forest LabsRunway77.0 / 61.0
Seedance 2.0 vs LTX 2.3 22BByteDanceLightricks78.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks76.0 / 52.0
Kling 3 Pro vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks76.0 / 52.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs LTX 2.3 22BMiniMaxLightricks75.0 / 52.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs LTX 2.3 22Bfal.aiLightricks75.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks70.0 / 52.0
Kling 3 Standard vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks69.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs LTX 2.3 22BByteDanceLightricks69.0 / 52.0
Veo 3.1 vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks63.0 / 52.0
Gen-4.5 vs LTX 2.3 22BRunwayLightricks61.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Seedance 2.0ByteDanceByteDance87.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling AI (Kuaishou)87.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling AI (Kuaishou)78.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03ByteDanceMiniMax87.0 / 75.0
Seedance 2.0 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03ByteDanceMiniMax78.0 / 75.0
Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax H3 MaxByteDancefal.ai87.0 / 75.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 3 ProGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.0 vs MiniMax H3 MaxByteDancefal.ai78.0 / 75.0

Methodology

How we tested FLUX 3 and LTX 2.3 22B

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from August 28, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.