Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.0

Overall, yes. Kling 4.0 scores 83.8 to Seedance 2.0's 77.6 and wins 10 of 13 rated categories. Seedance 2.0 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Seedance 2.0 runs $7.26/min; we don't have public pricing for Kling 4.0 to compare directly.

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Kling 4.0 yet.

Yes — Seedance 2.0 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Kling 4.0 leads 3d animation, by 14.0 points.

Kling 4.0 leads actor performance, by 13.3 points.

Kling 4.0 leads animals, by 12.9 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads text fidelity, by 12.6 points.

Kling 4.0 leads 2d animation, by 12.5 points.

Kling 4.0 leads human, by 9.6 points.

Kling 4.0 leads physics, by 8.8 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads objects, by 5.7 points.

Kling 4.0 leads taste, by 4.9 points.

Kling 4.0 leads scene consistency, by 4.4 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.