Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.0

Not on our scores — Seedance 2.0 edges ahead overall, 77.5 to 62.6, winning 13 of 13 rated categories. Veo 3.1 still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

No — Seedance 2.0 is the cheaper option at $7.26/min, versus $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Seedance 2.0 — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 8 seconds for Veo 3.1.

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Yes — Seedance 2.0 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Seedance 2.0 leads text fidelity, by 44.1 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads physics, by 21.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 3d animation, by 21.0 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 2d animation, by 19.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads human, by 16.3 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads logic consistency, by 15.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads animals, by 12.9 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads scene consistency, by 12.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads taste, by 11.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads prompt adherence, by 7.9 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.