#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2▲$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0
#3▼$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4▲$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro
#5▼$0.15/sBlack Forest LabsFLUX 3

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Kling 3 Standard vs Veo 3.1

By Megaton TeamOctober 2, 2026

Kling 3 Standard leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Kling 3 Standard evaluation example
Kling 3 Standard
Veo 3.1 evaluation example
Veo 3.1
Our verdict

Kling 3 Standard leads

Kling 3 Standard leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling AI (Kuaishou)

Kling 3 Standard

69.6Overall score
Rank
#12
Price per minute
$8.40/min
Google

Google

Veo 3.1

62.6Overall score
Rank
#15
Price per minute
$24.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Kling 3 Standard

Kling 3 Standard leads the overall score by 7.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 leads by 11.4 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Kling 3 Standard

Kling 3 Standard runs $8.40/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Provider prices can change.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
October 2, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Kling 3 Standard wins 10 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap3D Animation: Kling 3 Standard ahead by 17.0 points.
Closest categoryLogic Consistency: Kling 3 Standard ahead by 0.9 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Kling 3 StandardVeo 3.1
Physics
57.6
45.3
Prompt Adherence
82.9
79.6
Logic Consistency
66.4
65.5
Scene Consistency
82.2
79.5
Cinematography
75.7
62.9
Taste
63.1
51.9
2D Animation
46.4
45.0
3D Animation
66.0
49.0
Human
79.6
65.9
Actor Performance
59.0
62.0
Objects
90.0
95.4
Animals
71.4
67.1
Text Fidelity
30.3
41.7

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityKling 3 StandardVeo 3.1
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputNoYes
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Kling 3 Standard better than Veo 3.1?

Overall, yes. Kling 3 Standard scores 69.6 to Veo 3.1's 62.6 and wins 10 of 13 rated categories. Veo 3.1 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is Kling 3 Standard cheaper than Veo 3.1?

Yes. Kling 3 Standard runs $8.40/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Which makes longer clips, Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1?

Kling 3 Standard — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 8 seconds for Veo 3.1.

Does Kling 3 Standard generate audio?

Yes — Kling 3 Standard generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Does Veo 3.1 generate audio?

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for 3d animation?

Kling 3 Standard leads 3d animation, by 17.0 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for human?

Kling 3 Standard leads human, by 13.7 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for cinematography?

Kling 3 Standard leads cinematography, by 12.8 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for physics?

Kling 3 Standard leads physics, by 12.4 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for text fidelity?

Veo 3.1 leads text fidelity, by 11.4 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for taste?

Kling 3 Standard leads taste, by 11.1 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for objects?

Veo 3.1 leads objects, by 5.4 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for animals?

Kling 3 Standard leads animals, by 4.3 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for prompt adherence?

Kling 3 Standard leads prompt adherence, by 3.3 points.

Is Kling 3 Standard or Veo 3.1 better for actor performance?

Veo 3.1 leads actor performance, by 3.0 points.

How are Kling 3 Standard and Veo 3.1 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 87.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba70.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI70.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 63.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 3 StandardBlack Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 70.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 3 StandardGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 70.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 3 StandardKling AI (Kuaishou)Kling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 70.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Veo 3.1Pruna AIGoogle78.0 / 63.0
FLUX 3 vs Veo 3.1Black Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Standard vs MiniMax Hailuo 03Kling AI (Kuaishou)MiniMax70.0 / 75.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle76.0 / 63.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Kling 3 Standardfal.aiKling AI (Kuaishou)74.0 / 70.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Kling 3 StandardMiniMaxKling AI (Kuaishou)73.0 / 70.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Kling 3 StandardGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)70.0 / 70.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Veo 3.1MiniMaxGoogle75.0 / 63.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Veo 3.1fal.aiGoogle74.0 / 63.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Veo 3.1MiniMaxGoogle73.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0 MiniKling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance70.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle70.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI70.0 / 66.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway70.0 / 61.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle69.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Standard vs LTX 2.3 22BKling AI (Kuaishou)Lightricks70.0 / 52.0
P-Video 2 vs Veo 3.1Pruna AIGoogle66.0 / 63.0
Gen-4.5 vs Veo 3.1RunwayGoogle61.0 / 63.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Veo 3.1LightricksGoogle52.0 / 63.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0

Methodology

How we tested Kling 3 Standard and Veo 3.1

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from October 2, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.