Megaton
#1▼$0.30/sByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2▲$0.03/sAlibabaWan 3.0
#3▼$0.12/sByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4▲$0.04/sPruna AIP-Video 2 Pro
#5▼$0.15/sBlack Forest LabsFLUX 3

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

P-Video 2 Pro vs Veo 3.1

By Megaton TeamOctober 2, 2026

P-Video 2 Pro leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
P-Video 2 Pro evaluation example
P-Video 2 Pro
Veo 3.1 evaluation example
Veo 3.1
Try Veo 3.1

Affiliate link: Megaton may earn a commission if you purchase, at no extra cost to you.

Our verdict

P-Video 2 Pro leads

P-Video 2 Pro leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Pruna AI

Pruna AI

P-Video 2 Pro

77.5Overall score
Rank
#4
Price per minute
$2.25/min
Google

Google

Veo 3.1

62.6Overall score
Rank
#15
Price per minute
$24.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

P-Video 2 Pro

P-Video 2 Pro leads the overall score by 15.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

P-Video 2 Pro

P-Video 2 Pro leads by 41.7 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

P-Video 2 Pro

P-Video 2 Pro runs $2.25/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 generates audio with the video; P-Video 2 Pro does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
October 2, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

P-Video 2 Pro wins 12 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: P-Video 2 Pro ahead by 41.7 points.
Closest categoryLogic Consistency: P-Video 2 Pro ahead by 4.5 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

P-Video 2 ProVeo 3.1
Physics
67.7
45.3
Prompt Adherence
87.1
79.6
Logic Consistency
70.0
65.5
Scene Consistency
86.9
79.5
Cinematography
77.1
62.9
Taste
68.3
51.9
2D Animation
70.0
45.0
3D Animation
80.0
49.0
Human
80.7
65.9
Actor Performance
71.0
62.0
Objects
86.9
95.4
Animals
84.3
67.1
Text Fidelity
83.3
41.7

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full P-Video 2 Pro detailsSee full Veo 3.1 details
CapabilityP-Video 2 ProVeo 3.1
Text inputUnlistedYes
Image inputUnlistedYes
Video inputUnlistedYes
Audio inputUnlistedNo
Image outputUnlistedNo
Audio outputUnlistedYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is P-Video 2 Pro better than Veo 3.1?

Overall, yes. P-Video 2 Pro scores 77.5 to Veo 3.1's 62.6 and wins 12 of 13 rated categories. Veo 3.1 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is P-Video 2 Pro cheaper than Veo 3.1?

Yes. P-Video 2 Pro runs $2.25/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Does P-Video 2 Pro generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for P-Video 2 Pro yet.

Does Veo 3.1 generate audio?

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for text fidelity?

P-Video 2 Pro leads text fidelity, by 41.7 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for 3d animation?

P-Video 2 Pro leads 3d animation, by 31.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for 2d animation?

P-Video 2 Pro leads 2d animation, by 25.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for physics?

P-Video 2 Pro leads physics, by 22.4 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for animals?

P-Video 2 Pro leads animals, by 17.2 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for taste?

P-Video 2 Pro leads taste, by 16.4 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for human?

P-Video 2 Pro leads human, by 14.8 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for cinematography?

P-Video 2 Pro leads cinematography, by 14.3 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for actor performance?

P-Video 2 Pro leads actor performance, by 9.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 Pro or Veo 3.1 better for objects?

Veo 3.1 leads objects, by 8.6 points.

How are P-Video 2 Pro and Veo 3.1 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

P-Video 2 Pro

Veo 3.1

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 87.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.0Pruna AIByteDance78.0 / 78.0
FLUX 3 vs P-Video 2 ProBlack Forest LabsPruna AI77.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs P-Video 2 ProGooglePruna AI76.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Pro vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs P-Video 2 ProMiniMaxPruna AI75.0 / 78.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs P-Video 2 Profal.aiPruna AI74.0 / 78.0
H3 Max Turbo vs P-Video 2 ProMiniMaxPruna AI73.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs P-Video 2 ProGooglePruna AI70.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2 ProKling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI70.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 63.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Seedance 2.0 MiniPruna AIByteDance78.0 / 69.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba63.0 / 82.0
P-Video 2 vs P-Video 2 ProPruna AIPruna AI66.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 63.0
FLUX 3 vs Veo 3.1Black Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 63.0
P-Video 2 Pro vs Gen-4.5Pruna AIRunway78.0 / 61.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle76.0 / 63.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs P-Video 2 ProLightricksPruna AI52.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Veo 3.1MiniMaxGoogle75.0 / 63.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Veo 3.1fal.aiGoogle74.0 / 63.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Veo 3.1MiniMaxGoogle73.0 / 63.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle70.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google70.0 / 63.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle69.0 / 63.0
P-Video 2 vs Veo 3.1Pruna AIGoogle66.0 / 63.0
Gen-4.5 vs Veo 3.1RunwayGoogle61.0 / 63.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Veo 3.1LightricksGoogle52.0 / 63.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0

Methodology

How we tested P-Video 2 Pro and Veo 3.1

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from October 2, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports