V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0

By Megaton TeamSeptember 1, 2026

Seedance 2.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Gen-4.5 evaluation example
Gen-4.5
Seedance 2.0 evaluation example
Seedance 2.0
Our verdict

Seedance 2.0 leads

Seedance 2.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Runway

Runway

Gen-4.5

60.5Overall score
Rank
#13
Price per minute
$7.20/min
ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 2.0

77.5Overall score
Rank
#3
Price per minute
$7.26/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 leads the overall score by 17.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 leads by 38.6 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Gen-4.5

Gen-4.5 runs $7.20/min, against $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 generates audio with the video; Gen-4.5 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Seedance 2.0 wins 12 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Seedance 2.0 ahead by 38.6 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: Gen-4.5 ahead by 1.4 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Gen-4.5Seedance 2.0
Physics
38.8
66.5
Prompt Adherence
76.0
87.4
Logic Consistency
72.7
80.9
Scene Consistency
78.1
92.2
Cinematography
70.0
68.6
Taste
49.7
63.2
2D Animation
47.5
66.7
3D Animation
44.0
70.0
Human
67.4
82.2
Actor Performance
63.0
66.7
Objects
74.4
98.2
Animals
61.4
80.0
Text Fidelity
47.2
85.8

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityGen-4.5Seedance 2.0
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputNoYes
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Gen-4.5 better than Seedance 2.0?

Not on our scores — Seedance 2.0 edges ahead overall, 77.5 to 60.5, winning 12 of 13 rated categories. Gen-4.5 still leads in a few areas the category scores make clear.

Is Gen-4.5 cheaper than Seedance 2.0?

Yes. Gen-4.5 runs $7.20/min, against $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.

Which makes longer clips, Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0?

Seedance 2.0 — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 10 seconds for Gen-4.5.

Does Gen-4.5 generate audio?

No — Gen-4.5 outputs silent video; you'd add sound separately.

Does Seedance 2.0 generate audio?

Yes — Seedance 2.0 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for text fidelity?

Seedance 2.0 leads text fidelity, by 38.6 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for physics?

Seedance 2.0 leads physics, by 27.6 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for 3d animation?

Seedance 2.0 leads 3d animation, by 26.0 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for objects?

Seedance 2.0 leads objects, by 23.8 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for 2d animation?

Seedance 2.0 leads 2d animation, by 19.2 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for animals?

Seedance 2.0 leads animals, by 18.6 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for human?

Seedance 2.0 leads human, by 14.8 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for scene consistency?

Seedance 2.0 leads scene consistency, by 14.1 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for taste?

Seedance 2.0 leads taste, by 13.5 points.

Is Gen-4.5 or Seedance 2.0 better for prompt adherence?

Seedance 2.0 leads prompt adherence, by 11.3 points.

How are Gen-4.5 and Seedance 2.0 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.0Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0GoogleByteDance76.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 78.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.0MiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 78.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Seedance 2.0fal.aiByteDance75.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Seedance 2.0GoogleByteDance70.0 / 78.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Seedance 2.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance69.0 / 78.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.5RunwayByteDance61.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 69.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 63.0
FLUX 3 vs Gen-4.5Black Forest LabsRunway77.0 / 61.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Seedance 2.0LightricksByteDance52.0 / 78.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway76.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Gen-4.5MiniMaxRunway75.0 / 61.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Gen-4.5fal.aiRunway75.0 / 61.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway70.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway69.0 / 61.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniRunwayByteDance61.0 / 69.0
Gen-4.5 vs Veo 3.1RunwayGoogle61.0 / 63.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Gen-4.5LightricksRunway52.0 / 61.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Wan 3.0Black Forest LabsAlibaba77.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.5GoogleByteDance76.0 / 87.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba76.0 / 82.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Seedance 2.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)ByteDance76.0 / 87.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Wan 3.0Kling AI (Kuaishou)Alibaba76.0 / 82.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Seedance 2.5MiniMaxByteDance75.0 / 87.0

Methodology

How we tested Gen-4.5 and Seedance 2.0

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 1, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.