Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

P-Video 2 vs Veo 3.1

By Megaton TeamSeptember 14, 2026

P-Video 2 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
P-Video 2 evaluation example
P-Video 2
Veo 3.1 evaluation example
Veo 3.1
Try Veo 3.1

Affiliate link: Megaton may earn a commission if you purchase, at no extra cost to you.

Our verdict

P-Video 2 leads

P-Video 2 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Pruna AI

Pruna AI

P-Video 2

65.9Overall score
Rank
#13
Price per minute
$1.50/min
Google

Google

Veo 3.1

62.5Overall score
Rank
#14
Price per minute
$24.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

P-Video 2

P-Video 2 leads the overall score by 3.5 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 leads by 21.1 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

P-Video 2

P-Video 2 runs $1.50/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 generates audio with the video; P-Video 2 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 14, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

P-Video 2 wins 7 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapObjects: Veo 3.1 ahead by 35.6 points.
Closest categoryAnimals: level

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

P-Video 2Veo 3.1
Physics
58.2
45.3
Prompt Adherence
73.0
79.7
Logic Consistency
62.7
65.5
Scene Consistency
80.2
80.0
Cinematography
78.6
62.9
Taste
62.2
51.9
2D Animation
38.3
45.0
3D Animation
62.5
49.0
Human
81.1
65.9
Actor Performance
71.0
62.0
Objects
59.8
95.4
Animals
67.1
67.1
Text Fidelity
20.6
41.7

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full P-Video 2 detailsSee full Veo 3.1 details
CapabilityP-Video 2Veo 3.1
Text inputUnlistedYes
Image inputUnlistedYes
Video inputUnlistedYes
Audio inputUnlistedNo
Image outputUnlistedNo
Audio outputUnlistedYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is P-Video 2 better than Veo 3.1?

Overall, yes. P-Video 2 scores 65.9 to Veo 3.1's 62.5 and wins 7 of 13 rated categories. Veo 3.1 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is P-Video 2 cheaper than Veo 3.1?

Yes. P-Video 2 runs $1.50/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Does P-Video 2 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for P-Video 2 yet.

Does Veo 3.1 generate audio?

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for objects?

Veo 3.1 leads objects, by 35.6 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for text fidelity?

Veo 3.1 leads text fidelity, by 21.1 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for cinematography?

P-Video 2 leads cinematography, by 15.7 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for human?

P-Video 2 leads human, by 15.2 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for 3d animation?

P-Video 2 leads 3d animation, by 13.5 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for physics?

P-Video 2 leads physics, by 13.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for taste?

P-Video 2 leads taste, by 10.3 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for actor performance?

P-Video 2 leads actor performance, by 9.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for prompt adherence?

Veo 3.1 leads prompt adherence, by 6.7 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Veo 3.1 better for 2d animation?

Veo 3.1 leads 2d animation, by 6.7 points.

How are P-Video 2 and Veo 3.1 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

P-Video 2

Veo 3.1

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance66.0 / 87.0
P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba66.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 62.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0Pruna AIByteDance66.0 / 78.0
Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3.0GoogleAlibaba62.0 / 82.0
FLUX 3 vs P-Video 2Black Forest LabsPruna AI77.0 / 66.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 62.0
FLUX 3 vs Veo 3.1Black Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 62.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs P-Video 2GooglePruna AI76.0 / 66.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle76.0 / 62.0
Kling 3 Pro vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI76.0 / 66.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 62.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs P-Video 2MiniMaxPruna AI75.0 / 66.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs P-Video 2fal.aiPruna AI75.0 / 66.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Veo 3.1MiniMaxGoogle75.0 / 62.0
H3 Max Turbo vs P-Video 2MiniMaxPruna AI73.0 / 66.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Veo 3.1fal.aiGoogle75.0 / 62.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs P-Video 2GooglePruna AI70.0 / 66.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Veo 3.1MiniMaxGoogle73.0 / 62.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle70.0 / 62.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI69.0 / 66.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google69.0 / 62.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniPruna AIByteDance66.0 / 69.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle69.0 / 62.0
P-Video 2 vs Gen-4.5Pruna AIRunway66.0 / 61.0
Gen-4.5 vs Veo 3.1RunwayGoogle61.0 / 62.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs P-Video 2LightricksPruna AI52.0 / 66.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Veo 3.1LightricksGoogle52.0 / 62.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0

Methodology

How we tested P-Video 2 and Veo 3.1

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 14, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports