Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

P-Video 2 vs Gen-4.5

By Megaton TeamSeptember 14, 2026

P-Video 2 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
P-Video 2 evaluation example
P-Video 2
Gen-4.5 evaluation example
Gen-4.5
Our verdict

P-Video 2 leads

P-Video 2 leads this comparison on the published overall score.

Pruna AI

Pruna AI

P-Video 2

65.9Overall score
Rank
#13
Price per minute
$1.50/min
Runway

Runway

Gen-4.5

60.6Overall score
Rank
#15
Price per minute
$7.20/min

Best for

Highest overall score

P-Video 2

P-Video 2 leads the overall score by 5.3 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Gen-4.5

Gen-4.5 leads by 26.7 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

P-Video 2

P-Video 2 runs $1.50/min, against $7.20/min for Gen-4.5.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Gen-4.5

Gen-4.5 generates audio with the video; P-Video 2 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 14, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

P-Video 2 wins 8 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Gen-4.5 ahead by 26.7 points.
Closest categoryScene Consistency: P-Video 2 ahead by 2.1 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

P-Video 2Gen-4.5
Physics
58.2
38.8
Prompt Adherence
73.0
76.2
Logic Consistency
62.7
72.7
Scene Consistency
80.2
78.1
Cinematography
78.6
70.0
Taste
62.2
49.7
2D Animation
38.3
47.5
3D Animation
62.5
44.0
Human
81.1
67.4
Actor Performance
71.0
63.0
Objects
59.8
74.5
Animals
67.1
61.4
Text Fidelity
20.6
47.2

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full P-Video 2 detailsSee full Gen-4.5 details
CapabilityP-Video 2Gen-4.5
Text inputUnlistedYes
Image inputUnlistedYes
Video inputUnlistedYes
Audio inputUnlistedNo
Image outputUnlistedNo
Audio outputUnlistedNo

FAQ

Common questions

Is P-Video 2 better than Gen-4.5?

Overall, yes. P-Video 2 scores 65.9 to Gen-4.5's 60.6 and wins 8 of 13 rated categories. Gen-4.5 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is P-Video 2 cheaper than Gen-4.5?

Yes. P-Video 2 runs $1.50/min, against $7.20/min for Gen-4.5.

Does P-Video 2 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for P-Video 2 yet.

Does Gen-4.5 generate audio?

No — Gen-4.5 outputs silent video; you'd add sound separately.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for text fidelity?

Gen-4.5 leads text fidelity, by 26.7 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for physics?

P-Video 2 leads physics, by 19.4 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for 3d animation?

P-Video 2 leads 3d animation, by 18.5 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for objects?

Gen-4.5 leads objects, by 14.8 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for human?

P-Video 2 leads human, by 13.7 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for taste?

P-Video 2 leads taste, by 12.6 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for logic consistency?

Gen-4.5 leads logic consistency, by 10.0 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for 2d animation?

Gen-4.5 leads 2d animation, by 9.2 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for cinematography?

P-Video 2 leads cinematography, by 8.6 points.

Is P-Video 2 or Gen-4.5 better for actor performance?

P-Video 2 leads actor performance, by 8.0 points.

How are P-Video 2 and Gen-4.5 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

P-Video 2

Gen-4.5

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.5Pruna AIByteDance66.0 / 87.0
P-Video 2 vs Wan 3.0Pruna AIAlibaba66.0 / 82.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.5RunwayByteDance61.0 / 87.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0Pruna AIByteDance66.0 / 78.0
FLUX 3 vs P-Video 2Black Forest LabsPruna AI77.0 / 66.0
Gen-4.5 vs Wan 3.0RunwayAlibaba61.0 / 82.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs P-Video 2GooglePruna AI76.0 / 66.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0RunwayByteDance61.0 / 78.0
FLUX 3 vs Gen-4.5Black Forest LabsRunway77.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Pro vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI76.0 / 66.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway76.0 / 61.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs P-Video 2MiniMaxPruna AI75.0 / 66.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs P-Video 2fal.aiPruna AI75.0 / 66.0
H3 Max Turbo vs P-Video 2MiniMaxPruna AI73.0 / 66.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Gen-4.5MiniMaxRunway75.0 / 61.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs P-Video 2GooglePruna AI70.0 / 66.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Gen-4.5fal.aiRunway75.0 / 61.0
H3 Max Turbo vs Gen-4.5MiniMaxRunway73.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Standard vs P-Video 2Kling AI (Kuaishou)Pruna AI69.0 / 66.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway70.0 / 61.0
P-Video 2 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniPruna AIByteDance66.0 / 69.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway69.0 / 61.0
Gen-4.5 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniRunwayByteDance61.0 / 69.0
P-Video 2 vs Veo 3.1Pruna AIGoogle66.0 / 62.0
Gen-4.5 vs Veo 3.1RunwayGoogle61.0 / 62.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs P-Video 2LightricksPruna AI52.0 / 66.0
LTX 2.3 22B vs Gen-4.5LightricksRunway52.0 / 61.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDanceByteDance78.0 / 87.0
FLUX 3 vs Seedance 2.5Black Forest LabsByteDance77.0 / 87.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba78.0 / 82.0

Methodology

How we tested P-Video 2 and Gen-4.5

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 14, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports