Veo 3.1 vs LTX 2.3 22B

Overall, yes. Veo 3.1 scores 62.6 to LTX 2.3 22B's 51.8 and wins 13 of 13 rated categories. LTX 2.3 22B can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

No — LTX 2.3 22B is the cheaper option at $2.13/min, versus $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Veo 3.1 — up to 8 seconds per clip, versus 5 seconds for LTX 2.3 22B.

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Yes — LTX 2.3 22B generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Veo 3.1 leads objects, by 47.3 points.

Veo 3.1 leads text fidelity, by 30.1 points.

Veo 3.1 leads animals, by 22.9 points.

Veo 3.1 leads actor performance, by 21.0 points.

Veo 3.1 leads logic consistency, by 19.1 points.

Veo 3.1 leads scene consistency, by 15.8 points.

Veo 3.1 leads human, by 15.2 points.

Veo 3.1 leads 2d animation, by 14.2 points.

Veo 3.1 leads taste, by 9.9 points.

Veo 3.1 leads 3d animation, by 6.5 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.