Seedance 2.0 vs LTX 2.3 22B

Overall, yes. Seedance 2.0 scores 77.5 to LTX 2.3 22B's 51.8 and wins 13 of 13 rated categories. LTX 2.3 22B can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

No — LTX 2.3 22B is the cheaper option at $2.13/min, versus $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.

Seedance 2.0 — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 5 seconds for LTX 2.3 22B.

Yes — Seedance 2.0 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Yes — LTX 2.3 22B generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Seedance 2.0 leads text fidelity, by 74.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads objects, by 49.9 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads animals, by 35.7 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads logic consistency, by 34.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 2d animation, by 33.3 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads human, by 31.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads scene consistency, by 28.0 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 3d animation, by 27.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads physics, by 26.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads actor performance, by 25.7 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.