Seedance 2.0 vs FLUX 3

Overall, yes. Seedance 2.0 scores 77.5 to FLUX 3's 76.5 and wins 7 of 13 rated categories. FLUX 3 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Yes. Seedance 2.0 runs $7.26/min, against $9.18/min for FLUX 3.

Seedance 2.0 — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 5 seconds for FLUX 3.

Yes — Seedance 2.0 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Yes — FLUX 3 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Seedance 2.0 leads objects, by 14.4 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads human, by 8.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 2d animation, by 6.3 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads animals, by 4.3 points.

FLUX 3 leads physics, by 4.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 3d animation, by 4.0 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads text fidelity, by 3.4 points.

FLUX 3 leads cinematography, by 2.9 points.

FLUX 3 leads scene consistency, by 2.6 points.

FLUX 3 leads taste, by 1.8 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.