Kling 2.6 baseline
What is Kling 2.6?
Kling 2.6 is Kling AI (Kuaishou)'s AI video model. We use it as the baseline so you can find a higher overall score, a lower price, or stronger category results.
- Overall score
- 60.0
- Price per second
- $0.14/sec
Swipe for more top models
Editor's recommendation
Start with Seedance 2.0 for the highest overall score
Seedance 2.0 ranks first at 72.0 overall and $0.15/sec. Use the ranking to compare its price and score with Kling 2.6.
Ranked by overall score
The 10 best Kling 2.6 alternatives
Each model uses the same published baseline. Compare the score, price, gap from Kling 2.6, and available side-by-side evidence.
Seedance 2.0 ranks first at 72.0 overall and $0.15 per second.
Rank 1
Seedance 2.0
ByteDance
Seedance 2.0 scores 12.0 points above Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
72.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 72.0
- Price per second
- $0.15/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 12.0 points higher
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.011/sec more
Rank 2
Seedance 2.0 Fast
ByteDance
Seedance 2.0 Fast scores 10.0 points above Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
70.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 70.0
- Price per second
- $0.12/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 10.0 points higher
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.019/sec less
Rank 3
HappyHorse-1.0
Alibaba (Wan)
HappyHorse-1.0 scores 2.0 points above Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
62.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 62.0
- Price per second
- $0.14/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 2.0 points higher
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- Same price
Rank 4
Kling 3 Pro
Kling AI (Kuaishou)
Kling 3 Pro scores 2.0 points above Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
62.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 62.0
- Price per second
- $0.17/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 2.0 points higher
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.028/sec more
Rank 5
Veo 3
Google DeepMind
Veo 3 scores 0.0 points above Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
60.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 60.0
- Price per second
- $0.40/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- Same overall score
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.26/sec more
Rank 6
Grok Imagine 1.0
xAI
Grok Imagine 1.0 scores 2.0 points below Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
58.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 58.0
- Price per second
- $0.070/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 2.0 points lower
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.070/sec less
Rank 7
Veo 2
Google DeepMind
Veo 2 scores 4.0 points below Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
56.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 56.0
- Price per second
- $0.35/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 4.0 points lower
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.21/sec more
Rank 8
Veo 3.1
Google DeepMind
Veo 3.1 scores 4.0 points below Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
56.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 56.0
- Price per second
- $0.40/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 4.0 points lower
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.26/sec more
Rank 9
PixVerse v5.5
PixVerse
PixVerse v5.5 scores 5.0 points below Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
55.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 55.0
- Price per second
- $0.050/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 5.0 points lower
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.090/sec less
Rank 10
Grok 2025
xAI
Grok 2025 scores 6.0 points below Kling 2.6 overall.
Overall score
54.0
60.0
- Overall score
- 54.0
- Price per second
- $0.070/sec
- Score vs Kling 2.6
- 6.0 points lower
- Price vs Kling 2.6
- $0.070/sec less
Scores and prices are from the model snapshot updated Jul 25, 2026.
“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Direct evaluation examples
Watch Kling 2.6 beside the alternatives
Open a published comparison to see both models tested with the same evaluation data and video examples.
Example 01
Kling 2.6 vs Grok 2025
See the side-by-side example →Example 02
Kling 2.6 vs Grok Imagine 1.0
See the side-by-side example →Example 03
Kling 2.6 vs PixVerse v5.5
See the side-by-side example →Example 04
Kling 2.6 vs Veo 2
See the side-by-side example →Example 05
Kling 2.6 vs Veo 3.1
See the side-by-side example →Example 06
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 2.6
See the side-by-side example →Example 07
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 2.6
See the side-by-side example →Example 08
Veo 3 vs Kling 2.6
See the side-by-side example →Weekly AI video evidence
Get one concise weekly update on score changes, price shifts, and new model comparisons.