Swipe for more top models
Compare
Kling 3 Pro vs Kling 2.6
Kling 3 Pro edges out Kling 2.6 overall (Kling 3 Pro 62.0 vs Kling 2.6 60.0.) Kling 3 Pro is a clear upgrade from Kling 2.6 and the Veo 3.1 models on most dimensions. It excels at human performance and emotive acting, has some of the best prompt understanding of any model, and produces cinematic, well-composed shots with standout animal realism. It can very fluidly go from slow motion to regular speed, showing really good temporal coherence. It can generate some nonsensical outputs, so expect to run a few prompts to get it right. But when it gets it right, it's quite good. 2D animation and anime are average. Text rendering is just okay and may require some re-prompting. The main tradeoffs are in Expensive, Can generate nonsensical outputs, where Kling 2.6 tends to score better.
Kling 3 ProKling | Kling 2.6Kling |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | ||
| Image output | ||
| Audio output |
Providers
Provider
Kling
kling
Kling is the platform that serves Kling 3 Pro requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Kling
kling
Kling is the platform that serves Kling 2.6 requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Kling 3 Pro and Kling 2.6 are effectively tied on physics, with small tradeoffs across the metrics. The biggest separation is on Physics (0.2), but it's not decisive overall. In practice, you should decide based on the specific sub-metric you care about most, since neither model consistently dominates this slice of the rubric.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 59.3 | 59.5 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Kling 3 Pro leads on prompt and logic (+3.5), with a measurable advantage over Kling 2.6. The clearest separation is on Logic Consistency (+14.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 63.5 | 60.8 |
| Logic Consistency | 61.6 | 47.4 |
| Scene Consistency | 61.0 | 67.5 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Kling 2.6 leads on aesthetics (+2.1), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+4.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 2.6 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 63.3 | 67.6 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.7 | 0.6 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Kling 3 Pro leads on animation (+12.4), with a measurable advantage over Kling 2.6. The clearest separation is on Anime Animation (+36.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 47.3 | 61.3 |
| 3D Animation | 60.0 | 45.0 |
| Anime Animation | 51.3 | 15.0 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Kling 3 Pro leads on humans (+6.6), with a measurable advantage over Kling 2.6. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+26.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 75.9 | 67.4 |
| Hands | 57.8 | 72.5 |
| Actor Performance | 81.0 | 55.0 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Kling 3 Pro leads on objects and animals (+7.2), with a measurable advantage over Kling 2.6. The clearest separation is on Animals (+11.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 57.9 | 55.1 |
| Animals | 65.8 | 54.2 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Kling 3 Pro leads on text (+32.0), with a measurable advantage over Kling 2.6. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+32.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 53.7 | 21.7 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Kling 2.6 leads on cost and speed (+3.2), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Price / min (+9.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Kling 2.6 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Kling 3 Pro | Kling 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.168 | $0.070 |
| Price / min | $10.08 | $0.50 |
| Latency | 60.0s | 60.0s |