AI video model comparison

Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Grok 2025

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Grok Imagine 1.0 is the better overall choice over Grok 2025. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Grok Imagine 1.0
Grok 2025

“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Our verdict

Grok Imagine 1.0 is the better choice

Grok Imagine 1.0 scores higher than Grok 2025 in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in text rendering, but Grok 2025 is the only model here with audio output.

xAI

xAI

Grok Imagine 1.0

58.0Overall score
Rank
#7
Price per minute
$4.20/min
xAI

xAI

Grok 2025

54.0Overall score
Rank
#11
Price per minute
$4.20/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Grok Imagine 1.0

Grok Imagine 1.0 leads the overall score by 4.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Grok Imagine 1.0

Grok Imagine 1.0 leads by 32.0 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Built-in audio

Grok 2025

Grok 2025 generates audio with the video; Grok Imagine 1.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

84
videos rated
2,436
measurements
336
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Grok Imagine 1.0 wins 10 of 14 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Grok Imagine 1.0 ahead by 32.0 points.
Closest category2D Animation: Grok 2025 ahead by 0.8 points.

Head-to-head scores

14 categories rated head-to-head

Grok Imagine 1.0Grok 2025
Physics
40.4
45.9
Prompt Adherence
66.7
54.5
Logic Consistency
66.7
43.3
Scene Consistency
54.9
66.9
Cinematography
60.7
52.7
2D Animation
71.7
72.5
3D Animation
85.0
67.7
Anime Animation
61.0
39.5
Human
65.6
57.9
Hands
59.7
39.7
Actor Performance
64.0
34.7
Objects
54.7
53.1
Animals
53.6
54.5
Text Fidelity
69.0
37.0

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Grok Imagine 1.0
41 videos rated · Jul 2026
Grok 2025
43 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Grok Imagine 1.0Grok 2025

Grok Imagine 1.0's biggest lead: Clean framing, 98.0% versus 95.0%.

Grok 2025's biggest lead: Motion stability, 35.0 versus 20.0.

Technical cleanliness
61.0%
60.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
95.0%
100.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
98.0%
95.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
20.0
35.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
51.0
55.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Same prompt, side by side

Both videos in each row were generated from the prompt shown. Watch them side by side to compare how each model handled the same request.

Video test 1

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Grok 2025 leads here by 5.5 points.

Show the full prompt

Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.

Physics videos generated from the same prompt by Grok Imagine 1.0 and Grok 2025
Grok Imagine 1.0
Grok 2025

Video test 2

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Grok Imagine 1.0 leads here by 8.0 points.

Show the full prompt

POV from inside a car trunk looking up at three figures who've just opened it. Wide lens, dramatic lighting from below, the perspective is specific and iconic.

Cinematography videos generated from the same prompt by Grok Imagine 1.0 and Grok 2025
Grok Imagine 1.0
Grok 2025

Video test 3

Prompt Adherence

Whether the requested subject, action, composition, and visual treatment remain intact.

Related category score

Grok Imagine 1.0 leads here by 12.2 points.

Show the full prompt

Inside an opulent royal greenhouse filled with orchids, a blue ceramic watering can sits in the foreground on the left, and a terracotta pot with a single red tulip sits in the foreground on the right. A shallow reflecting pond runs through the middle and must show clear reflections. At second 2, a hummingbird enters from the top center and hovers directly above the tulip for exactly three seconds, then exits upward at second 5. The watering can and pot must remain fixed.

Prompt Adherence videos generated from the same prompt by Grok Imagine 1.0 and Grok 2025
Grok Imagine 1.0
Grok 2025

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityGrok Imagine 1.0Grok 2025
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoYes
Audio outputNoYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Grok Imagine 1.0 better than Grok 2025?

Grok Imagine 1.0 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Grok Imagine 1.0 cheaper than Grok 2025?

Both models cost $4.20 per minute.

Does Grok Imagine 1.0 generate audio?

No, Grok Imagine 1.0 does not include audio output.

Does Grok 2025 generate audio?

Yes, Grok 2025 includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Grok Imagine 1.0 or Grok 2025?

Both models list a 15-second maximum clip duration.

Which model scores higher on Text Fidelity, Grok Imagine 1.0 or Grok 2025?

Grok Imagine 1.0 scores higher for text rendering.

Which model scores higher on Actor Performance, Grok Imagine 1.0 or Grok 2025?

Grok Imagine 1.0 scores higher for actor performance.

How are Grok Imagine 1.0 and Grok 2025 compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs Grok Imagine 1.0ByteDancexai73.0 / 58.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Grok Imagine 1.0Klingxai62.0 / 58.0
Kling 2.6 vs Grok Imagine 1.0Klingxai60.0 / 58.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Grok 2025ByteDancexai73.0 / 54.0
Veo 3 vs Grok Imagine 1.0Googlexai60.0 / 58.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Grok 2025Klingxai62.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 2xaiGoogle58.0 / 56.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 3.1xaiGoogle58.0 / 56.0
Kling 2.6 vs Grok 2025Klingxai60.0 / 54.0
Veo 3 vs Grok 2025Googlexai60.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs PixVerse v5.5xaiPixVerse58.0 / 55.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Seedance 1.5 ProxaiByteDance58.0 / 53.0
Veo 2 vs Grok 2025Googlexai56.0 / 54.0
Veo 3.1 vs Grok 2025Googlexai56.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 3.1 FastxaiGoogle58.0 / 51.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Sora 2 ProxaiOpenAI58.0 / 50.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs Grok 2025PixVersexai55.0 / 54.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Veo 3 FastxaiGoogle58.0 / 48.0
Grok 2025 vs Seedance 1.5 ProxaiByteDance54.0 / 53.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Vidu Q2xaiVidu58.0 / 45.0
Grok 2025 vs Veo 3.1 FastxaiGoogle54.0 / 51.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs LTX-2 19BxaiLightricks58.0 / 43.0
Grok 2025 vs Sora 2 ProxaiOpenAI54.0 / 50.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Gen-4.5xaiRunway58.0 / 40.0
Grok 2025 vs Veo 3 FastxaiGoogle54.0 / 48.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoxaiPika58.0 / 26.0
Grok 2025 vs Vidu Q2xaiVidu54.0 / 45.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Infinity StarxaiFoundationVision58.0 / 24.0
Grok 2025 vs LTX-2 19BxaiLightricks54.0 / 43.0
Grok 2025 vs Gen-4.5xaiRunway54.0 / 40.0
Grok 2025 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoxaiPika54.0 / 26.0
Grok 2025 vs Infinity StarxaiFoundationVision54.0 / 24.0

Methodology

How we tested Grok Imagine 1.0 and Grok 2025

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 84 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.