Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Wan 3.0 vs Veo 3.1

By Megaton TeamSeptember 1, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Add as preferred source
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Veo 3.1 evaluation example
Veo 3.1
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.6Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min
Google

Google

Veo 3.1

62.5Overall score
Rank
#12
Price per minute
$24.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 19.1 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 40.8 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins all 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapText Fidelity: Wan 3.0 ahead by 40.8 points.
Closest categoryObjects: Wan 3.0 ahead by 3.1 points.

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Wan 3.0Veo 3.1
Physics
71.8
45.3
Prompt Adherence
94.7
79.5
Logic Consistency
78.2
65.5
Scene Consistency
92.9
80.0
Cinematography
72.9
62.9
Taste
68.1
51.7
2D Animation
70.0
46.7
3D Animation
76.0
49.0
Human
86.7
65.9
Actor Performance
66.0
62.0
Objects
98.7
95.6
Animals
84.3
67.1
Text Fidelity
82.5
41.7

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Wan 3.0 detailsSee full Veo 3.1 details
CapabilityWan 3.0Veo 3.1
Text inputUnlistedYes
Image inputUnlistedYes
Video inputUnlistedYes
Audio inputUnlistedNo
Image outputUnlistedNo
Audio outputUnlistedYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Wan 3.0 better than Veo 3.1?

Overall, yes. Wan 3.0 scores 81.6 to Veo 3.1's 62.5 and wins 13 of 13 rated categories. Veo 3.1 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is Wan 3.0 cheaper than Veo 3.1?

Yes. Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Does Veo 3.1 generate audio?

Yes — Veo 3.1 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 40.8 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 27.0 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 26.5 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 23.3 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for human?

Wan 3.0 leads human, by 20.7 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for animals?

Wan 3.0 leads animals, by 17.2 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for taste?

Wan 3.0 leads taste, by 16.4 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 15.3 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 12.9 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Veo 3.1 better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 12.7 points.

How are Wan 3.0 and Veo 3.1 tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

Continue researching

Wan 3.0

Veo 3.1

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0AlibabaByteDance82.0 / 78.0
Wan 3.0 vs FLUX 3AlibabaBlack Forest Labs82.0 / 77.0
Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashAlibabaGoogle82.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs Kling 3 ProAlibabaKling AI (Kuaishou)82.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03AlibabaMiniMax82.0 / 75.0
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax H3 MaxAlibabafal.ai82.0 / 75.0
Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni FlashAlibabaGoogle82.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs Kling 3 StandardAlibabaKling AI (Kuaishou)82.0 / 69.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 63.0
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniAlibabaByteDance82.0 / 69.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 63.0
Wan 3.0 vs Gen-4.5AlibabaRunway82.0 / 61.0
FLUX 3 vs Veo 3.1Black Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 63.0
Wan 3.0 vs LTX 2.3 22BAlibabaLightricks82.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Veo 3.1MiniMaxGoogle75.0 / 63.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Veo 3.1fal.aiGoogle75.0 / 63.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle70.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Standard vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google69.0 / 63.0
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Veo 3.1ByteDanceGoogle69.0 / 63.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks63.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Seedance 2.0ByteDanceByteDance87.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.5 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs87.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.0 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs78.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling AI (Kuaishou)87.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03ByteDanceMiniMax87.0 / 75.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 76.0

Methodology

How we tested Wan 3.0 and Veo 3.1

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 1, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.