V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni Flash

By Megaton TeamSeptember 1, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Gemini Omni Flash evaluation example
Gemini Omni Flash
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.6Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min
Google

Google

Gemini Omni Flash

70.2Overall score
Rank
#9
Price per minute
$6.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 11.4 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads by 6.2 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $6/min for Gemini Omni Flash.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Gemini Omni Flash

Gemini Omni Flash generates audio with the video; Wan 3.0 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins 11 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap2D Animation: Wan 3.0 ahead by 27.5 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: level

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Wan 3.0Gemini Omni Flash
Physics
71.8
58.8
Prompt Adherence
94.7
90.5
Logic Consistency
78.2
62.7
Scene Consistency
92.9
81.1
Cinematography
72.9
72.9
Taste
68.1
59.8
2D Animation
70.0
42.5
3D Animation
76.0
62.0
Human
86.7
73.6
Actor Performance
66.0
63.0
Objects
98.7
99.0
Animals
84.3
75.7
Text Fidelity
82.5
76.3

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityWan 3.0Gemini Omni Flash
Text inputUnlistedYes
Image inputUnlistedYes
Video inputUnlistedNo
Audio inputUnlistedNo
Image outputUnlistedNo
Audio outputUnlistedNo

FAQ

Common questions

Is Wan 3.0 better than Gemini Omni Flash?

Overall, yes. Wan 3.0 scores 81.6 to Gemini Omni Flash's 70.2 and wins 11 of 13 rated categories. Gemini Omni Flash can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is Wan 3.0 cheaper than Gemini Omni Flash?

Yes. Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $6/min for Gemini Omni Flash.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Does Gemini Omni Flash generate audio?

No — Gemini Omni Flash outputs silent video; you'd add sound separately.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 27.5 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 15.5 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for 3d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 3d animation, by 14.0 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for human?

Wan 3.0 leads human, by 13.1 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 12.9 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 11.8 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for animals?

Wan 3.0 leads animals, by 8.6 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for taste?

Wan 3.0 leads taste, by 8.2 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for text fidelity?

Wan 3.0 leads text fidelity, by 6.2 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni Flash better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 4.2 points.

How are Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni Flash tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0AlibabaByteDance82.0 / 78.0
Wan 3.0 vs FLUX 3AlibabaBlack Forest Labs82.0 / 77.0
Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashAlibabaGoogle82.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs Kling 3 ProAlibabaKling AI (Kuaishou)82.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03AlibabaMiniMax82.0 / 75.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Gemini Omni FlashByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax H3 MaxAlibabafal.ai82.0 / 75.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni FlashByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs Kling 3 StandardAlibabaKling AI (Kuaishou)82.0 / 69.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniAlibabaByteDance82.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni FlashGoogleGoogle76.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs Veo 3.1AlibabaGoogle82.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gemini Omni FlashKling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs Gen-4.5AlibabaRunway82.0 / 61.0
MiniMax Hailuo 03 vs Gemini Omni FlashMiniMaxGoogle75.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs LTX 2.3 22BAlibabaLightricks82.0 / 52.0
MiniMax H3 Max vs Gemini Omni Flashfal.aiGoogle75.0 / 70.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Kling 3 StandardGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)70.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance70.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle70.0 / 63.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway70.0 / 61.0
Gemini Omni Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks70.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Seedance 2.0ByteDanceByteDance87.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.5 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs87.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.0 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs78.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling AI (Kuaishou)87.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03ByteDanceMiniMax87.0 / 75.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 76.0

Methodology

How we tested Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni Flash

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 1, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.