V-Benchmark v2.0 comparison

Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

By Megaton TeamSeptember 1, 2026

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Share
Wan 3.0 evaluation example
Wan 3.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash evaluation example
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Our verdict

Wan 3.0 leads

Wan 3.0 leads this v-benchmark v2 comparison on the published overall score.

Alibaba

Alibaba

Wan 3.0

81.6Overall score
Rank
#2
Price per minute
$1.95/min
Google

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

76.0Overall score
Rank
#5
Price per minute
$6.00/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 leads the overall score by 5.6 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash leads by 9.6 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Wan 3.0

Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $6/min for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.

Provider prices can change.

0
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
September 1, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Wan 3.0 wins 7 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapPhysics: Wan 3.0 ahead by 13.5 points.
Closest category3D Animation: level

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Wan 3.0Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Physics
71.8
58.2
Prompt Adherence
94.7
87.2
Logic Consistency
78.2
72.7
Scene Consistency
92.9
88.8
Cinematography
72.9
68.6
Taste
68.1
65.8
2D Animation
70.0
64.6
3D Animation
76.0
76.0
Human
86.7
87.0
Actor Performance
66.0
74.0
Objects
98.7
99.1
Animals
84.3
87.1
Text Fidelity
82.5
92.1

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityWan 3.0Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
Text inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image inputUnlistedUnlisted
Video inputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio inputUnlistedUnlisted
Image outputUnlistedUnlisted
Audio outputUnlistedUnlisted

FAQ

Common questions

Is Wan 3.0 better than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash?

Overall, yes. Wan 3.0 scores 81.6 to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash's 76.0 and wins 7 of 13 rated categories. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

Is Wan 3.0 cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash?

Yes. Wan 3.0 runs $1.95/min, against $6/min for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.

Does Wan 3.0 generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Wan 3.0 yet.

Does Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash generate audio?

We haven't confirmed native audio output for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash yet.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for physics?

Wan 3.0 leads physics, by 13.5 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for text fidelity?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash leads text fidelity, by 9.6 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for actor performance?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash leads actor performance, by 8.0 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for prompt adherence?

Wan 3.0 leads prompt adherence, by 7.5 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for logic consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads logic consistency, by 5.5 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for 2d animation?

Wan 3.0 leads 2d animation, by 5.4 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for cinematography?

Wan 3.0 leads cinematography, by 4.3 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for scene consistency?

Wan 3.0 leads scene consistency, by 4.1 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for animals?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash leads animals, by 2.8 points.

Is Wan 3.0 or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash better for taste?

Wan 3.0 leads taste, by 2.2 points.

How are Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash tested?

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0ByteDanceAlibaba87.0 / 82.0
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0AlibabaByteDance82.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle87.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs FLUX 3AlibabaBlack Forest Labs82.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashByteDanceGoogle78.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs Kling 3 ProAlibabaKling AI (Kuaishou)82.0 / 76.0
FLUX 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashBlack Forest LabsGoogle77.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03AlibabaMiniMax82.0 / 75.0
Wan 3.0 vs MiniMax H3 MaxAlibabafal.ai82.0 / 75.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 3 ProGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 76.0
Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni FlashAlibabaGoogle82.0 / 70.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs MiniMax Hailuo 03GoogleMiniMax76.0 / 75.0
Wan 3.0 vs Kling 3 StandardAlibabaKling AI (Kuaishou)82.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs MiniMax H3 MaxGooglefal.ai76.0 / 75.0
Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 MiniAlibabaByteDance82.0 / 69.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni FlashGoogleGoogle76.0 / 70.0
Wan 3.0 vs Veo 3.1AlibabaGoogle82.0 / 63.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Kling 3 StandardGoogleKling AI (Kuaishou)76.0 / 69.0
Wan 3.0 vs Gen-4.5AlibabaRunway82.0 / 61.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Seedance 2.0 MiniGoogleByteDance76.0 / 69.0
Wan 3.0 vs LTX 2.3 22BAlibabaLightricks82.0 / 52.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Veo 3.1GoogleGoogle76.0 / 63.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway76.0 / 61.0
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs LTX 2.3 22BGoogleLightricks76.0 / 52.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Seedance 2.0ByteDanceByteDance87.0 / 78.0
Seedance 2.5 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs87.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.0 vs FLUX 3ByteDanceBlack Forest Labs78.0 / 77.0
Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling AI (Kuaishou)87.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax Hailuo 03ByteDanceMiniMax87.0 / 75.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3 ProByteDanceKling AI (Kuaishou)78.0 / 76.0
Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax H3 MaxByteDancefal.ai87.0 / 75.0
FLUX 3 vs Kling 3 ProBlack Forest LabsKling AI (Kuaishou)77.0 / 76.0

Methodology

How we tested Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from September 1, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.