Seedance 2.0 vs Gen-4.5

Overall, yes. Seedance 2.0 scores 77.5 to Gen-4.5's 60.5 and wins 12 of 13 rated categories. Gen-4.5 can still be the better fit for specific work — the category scores above show where.

No — Gen-4.5 is the cheaper option at $7.20/min, versus $7.26/min for Seedance 2.0.

Seedance 2.0 — up to 15 seconds per clip, versus 10 seconds for Gen-4.5.

Yes — Seedance 2.0 generates audio together with the video, in the same file.

No — Gen-4.5 outputs silent video; you'd add sound separately.

Seedance 2.0 leads text fidelity, by 38.6 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads physics, by 27.6 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 3d animation, by 26.0 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads objects, by 23.8 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads 2d animation, by 19.2 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads animals, by 18.6 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads human, by 14.8 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads scene consistency, by 14.1 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads taste, by 13.5 points.

Seedance 2.0 leads prompt adherence, by 11.3 points.

Both models run the same prompts. Professional reviewers score each video 0–100 on how well it follows the prompt and handles motion, people, objects, animation, and text, while automated checks flag freezes, bad framing, and unstable motion. This matchup draws on 0 rated videos and 0 reviewer ratings.