Model Details
Capabilities
Image To ImageImage → VideoReference To VideoText → ImageText → VideoVideo → Video
Constraints
Inputs: Text, Image, VideoOutputs: Image, VideoOutput lengths: 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8sAspect ratios: 16:9, 9:16, 1:1
Scores
Examples
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Blind evaluation
Blind evaluation prompt
Compare Models
Cost/min—
Cost/min—
Cost/min—
All Comparison Pages
| Rank | Model | Provider | Score | Compare Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #3 | Seedance 2.0Top 5 | ByteDance | 78 | Vidu Q2 vs Seedance 2.0 |
| #6 | Kling 3 Pro | Kling AI (Kuaishou) | 76 | Vidu Q2 vs Kling 3 Pro |
| #14 | Veo 3.1 | 62 | Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3.1 | |
| #15 | Gen-4.5 | Runway | 61 | Vidu Q2 vs Gen-4.5 |
| — | Grok | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Grok |
| — | Grok Imagine 1.0 | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Grok Imagine 1.0 |
| — | Infinity Star | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Infinity Star |
| — | Kling 2.6 | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Kling 2.6 |
| — | LTX 2 19B | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs LTX 2 19B |
| — | Pika V2.2 | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Pika V2.2 |
| — | PixVerse V5.5 | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs PixVerse V5.5 |
| — | Seedance 1.5 Pro | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Seedance 1.5 Pro |
| — | Sora 2 Pro | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Sora 2 Pro |
| — | Veo 2 | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Veo 2 |
| — | Veo 3 | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3 |
| — | Veo 3 Fast | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3 Fast |
| — | Veo 3.1 Fast | — | — | Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3.1 Fast |
Compare Vidu Q2
vs
xAI
Grok Imagine 1.0
vs
xAI
Grok 2025
vs
FoundationVision (ByteDance)
Infinity Star
76
76
vs
Kling AI (Kuaishou)
Kling 3 Pro
vs
Kling AI (Kuaishou)
Kling 2.6
+12 more comparisons available