Vidu
Vidu

Vidu Q2

Image-to-video model emphasizing subtle facial expressions, smooth camera moves, and fast turnaround. Features Turbo and Pro modes with 2-8 second clips at up to 1080p.
rank
14
cost
$21.60
/min
Vidu Q2
Total Score
45
45

Scores

Physics44.0
Prompt Adherence46.0
Animation56.6
2D Animation38.0
3D Animation69.0
Anime Animation63.0
Cinematography47.0
Human50.0
Hands59.0
Animals38.0
Objects34.0
Logic + Consistency37.0
Scene Consistency45.0
Text Fidelity32.0
Actor Performance55.0
Total Score45.0

Evaluation Summary

Good for
  • Animation
  • CG work
  • Budget-friendly rapid iteration
Bad for
  • Cinematography
  • Taste/judgment
  • Most other categories
Summary

Vidu Q2 scores a little below average or just about average across the board. The exception is animation, where it does quite well. Given its low cost, it's a good contender for rapid iterations on CG work. However, it has poor cinematography, judgment, and taste, scoring below average on most other categories.

Examples

Single continuous shot in a sci-fi hangar with glossy floors and strong backlight haze. Keep a parked spaceship on the left, a glowing door panel on the right wall, and a metal crate centered in the foreground. A female lead runs from the background toward the crate and pivots around it without touching it. A small drone swoops in from the right and scans her with a sweeping light beam as it passes overhead. She slides behind the crate for cover, then pops out and slaps the glowing door panel once. The door panel flashes brighter and she holds in a ready stance facing it. The crate must never move and the spaceship must remain stationary. No cuts.
Macro shot: a tattoo artist's gloved hands at work, needle buzzing against skin, other hand stretching the canvas taut. Ink, blood, precision. Five fingers per hand, always.
A pianist's hands playing Chopin—arched wrists, curved fingers, striking keys with controlled force. We see both hands in frame, moving independently.
A punk rock drummer absolutely destroys a kit, sticks blurring, head thrashing. Freeze for a moment on her mid-scream face, then resume chaos.
Cinematic slow-motion of a boxer throwing a punch at a heavy bag. Muscles contract in shoulders and arms, sweat flies, face shows exertion.
A woman practices yoga at sunrise on a cliff overlooking the ocean, flowing from warrior pose into a deep lunge. Wind catches her hair.
Olympic swimmer jumps into a pool and swims a full lap and emerges from the water on the other side of the pool
Female javelin throwing athlete runs with a javelin and tosses it into the air.
Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.

Compare Models

Kling 2.6
60
60
Cost/min$4.20
Extend Video
Audio
Realtime
LTX-2 19B
43
43
Lightricks

LTX-2 19B

Cost/min$2.40
Audio
Realtime
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
26
26
Cost/min$2.10
Realtime
PixVerse v5.5
55
55
Cost/min$4.80
Gen-4.5
40
40
Runway

Gen-4.5

Cost/min$3.00
All Comparison Pages
RankModelProviderScoreCompare Page
#1
Seedance 2.0 ProTop 5
ByteDance73Vidu Q2 vs Seedance 2.0 Pro
#2
Kling 3 ProTop 5
Kling62Vidu Q2 vs Kling 3 Pro
#3
Kling 2.6Top 5
Kling60Vidu Q2 vs Kling 2.6
#3
Veo 3Top 5
Google60Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3
#5
Grok Imagine 1.0Top 5
xai59Vidu Q2 vs Grok Imagine 1.0
#6
Veo 3.1
Google57Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3.1
#7
PixVerse v5.5
PixVerse55Vidu Q2 vs PixVerse v5.5
#7
Veo 2
Google55Vidu Q2 vs Veo 2
#9
Grok 2025
xai54Vidu Q2 vs Grok 2025
#10
Seedance 1.5 Pro
ByteDance53Vidu Q2 vs Seedance 1.5 Pro
#11
Veo 3.1 Fast
Google52Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3.1 Fast
#12
Sora 2 Pro
OpenAI50Vidu Q2 vs Sora 2 Pro
#13
Veo 3 Fast
Google48Vidu Q2 vs Veo 3 Fast
#15
LTX-2 19B
Lightricks43Vidu Q2 vs LTX-2 19B
#16
Gen-4.5
Runway40Vidu Q2 vs Gen-4.5
#17
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Pika26Vidu Q2 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
#18
Infinity Star
FoundationVision25Vidu Q2 vs Infinity Star