Legacy evaluation · V1

Vidu Q2 vs LTX-2 19B

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Vidu Q2 is the better overall choice over LTX-2 19B. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Vidu Q2
LTX-2 19B
Our verdict

Vidu Q2 is the better choice

Vidu Q2 scores higher than LTX-2 19B in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in 3D animation, and it also supports longer clips.

ShengShu Technology (Vidu)

ShengShu Technology (Vidu)

Vidu Q2

45.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$1.20/min
Lightricks

Lightricks

LTX-2 19B

43.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$2.39/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Vidu Q2

Vidu Q2 leads the overall score by 2.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Vidu Q2

Vidu Q2 leads by 12.7 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Vidu Q2

Vidu Q2 runs $1.20/min, against $2.39/min for LTX-2 19B.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

LTX-2 19B

LTX-2 19B generates audio with the video; Vidu Q2 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

92
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Vidu Q2 wins 6 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gap3D Animation: Vidu Q2 ahead by 40.7 points.
Closest categoryActor Performance: Vidu Q2 ahead by 0.7 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Vidu Q2LTX-2 19B
Physics
43.8
41.9
Prompt Adherence
45.8
50.0
Logic Consistency
37.2
16.8
Scene Consistency
45.2
52.2
Cinematography
46.6
53.4
2D Animation
38.0
55.0
3D Animation
69.0
28.3
Human
49.7
33.6
Actor Performance
55.0
54.3
Objects
34.4
47.6
Animals
38.1
54.6
Text Fidelity
32.0
19.3

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Vidu Q2 leads here by 12.7 points.

Matched Text outputs from Vidu Q2 and LTX-2 19B
Loading video
Vidu Q2
Loading video
LTX-2 19B

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Vidu Q2 leads here by 1.9 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Vidu Q2 and LTX-2 19B
Loading video
Vidu Q2
Loading video
LTX-2 19B

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

LTX-2 19B leads here by 6.8 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Vidu Q2 and LTX-2 19B
Loading video
Vidu Q2
Loading video
LTX-2 19B

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityVidu Q2LTX-2 19B
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputNoYes
Image outputYesNo
Audio outputNoYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Vidu Q2 better than LTX-2 19B?

Vidu Q2 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Vidu Q2 cheaper than LTX-2 19B?

LTX-2 19B costs less at $2.39 per minute, compared with $3.60 for Vidu Q2.

Does Vidu Q2 generate audio?

No, Vidu Q2 does not include audio output.

Does LTX-2 19B generate audio?

Yes, LTX-2 19B includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Vidu Q2 or LTX-2 19B?

Vidu Q2 supports longer clips at 8 seconds, compared with 5 seconds for LTX-2 19B.

Which model scores higher on 3D Animation, Vidu Q2 or LTX-2 19B?

Vidu Q2 scores higher for 3D animation.

Which model scores higher on Anime Animation, Vidu Q2 or LTX-2 19B?

Vidu Q2 scores higher for anime.

How are Vidu Q2 and LTX-2 19B compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Vidu Q2 and LTX-2 19B

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.