Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#3
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#4
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
#5
Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 3 Pro

Swipe for more top models

Legacy evaluation · V1

Veo 3.1 vs Vidu Q2

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Veo 3.1 is the better overall choice over Vidu Q2. It scores higher in nearly every quality category shown.

Share
Veo 3.1
Vidu Q2
Our verdict

Veo 3.1 is the better choice

Veo 3.1 scores higher than Vidu Q2 in nearly every quality category shown. Its biggest lead is in animal generation, and it also is the only model here with audio output.

Google

Google

Veo 3.1

56.0Overall score
Rank
#11
Price per minute
$24.00/min
ShengShu Technology (Vidu)

ShengShu Technology (Vidu)

Vidu Q2

45.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$1.20/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 leads the overall score by 11.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 leads by 7.5 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Vidu Q2

Vidu Q2 runs $1.20/min, against $24/min for Veo 3.1.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 generates audio with the video; Vidu Q2 does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

92
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Veo 3.1 wins 10 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapAnimals: Veo 3.1 ahead by 29.9 points.
Closest categoryCinematography: Veo 3.1 ahead by 0.7 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Veo 3.1Vidu Q2
Physics
55.9
43.8
Prompt Adherence
67.0
45.8
Logic Consistency
47.2
37.2
Scene Consistency
50.6
45.2
Cinematography
47.3
46.6
2D Animation
46.0
38.0
3D Animation
54.0
69.0
Human
61.9
49.7
Actor Performance
40.0
55.0
Objects
61.7
34.4
Animals
68.0
38.1
Text Fidelity
39.5
32.0

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 leads here by 7.5 points.

Matched Text outputs from Veo 3.1 and Vidu Q2
Loading video
Veo 3.1
Loading video
Vidu Q2

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 leads here by 12.1 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Veo 3.1 and Vidu Q2
Loading video
Veo 3.1
Loading video
Vidu Q2

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Veo 3.1 leads here by 0.7 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Veo 3.1 and Vidu Q2
Loading video
Veo 3.1
Loading video
Vidu Q2

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Veo 3.1 detailsSee full Vidu Q2 details
CapabilityVeo 3.1Vidu Q2
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoYes
Audio outputYesNo

FAQ

Common questions

Is Veo 3.1 better than Vidu Q2?

Veo 3.1 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Veo 3.1 cheaper than Vidu Q2?

Vidu Q2 costs less at $3.60 per minute, compared with $24 for Veo 3.1.

Does Veo 3.1 generate audio?

Yes, Veo 3.1 includes audio output.

Does Vidu Q2 generate audio?

No, Vidu Q2 does not include audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Veo 3.1 or Vidu Q2?

Both models list a 8-second maximum clip duration.

Which model scores higher on Animals, Veo 3.1 or Vidu Q2?

Veo 3.1 scores higher for animal generation.

Which model scores higher on Objects, Veo 3.1 or Vidu Q2?

Veo 3.1 scores higher for object generation.

How are Veo 3.1 and Vidu Q2 compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

Continue researching

Veo 3.1

Vidu Q2

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 56.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway56.0 / 61.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Veo 3.1 and Vidu Q2

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.