Swipe for more top models
Compare
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Vidu Q2
Veo 3.1 Fast edges out Vidu Q2 overall (Veo 3.1 Fast 51.0 vs Vidu Q2 45.0.) Veo 3.1 Fast looks stronger on Objects and Animals, Text, Humans, Aesthetics. The main tradeoffs are in Animation, where Vidu Q2 tends to score better.
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | Vidu Q2Vidu |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | — | — |
| Image output | ||
| Audio output | — | — |
Providers
Provider
Google
google-veo
Google is the platform that serves Veo 3.1 Fast requests, pricing, and availability.
Provider
Vidu
vidu
Vidu is the platform that serves Vidu Q2 requests, pricing, and availability.
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on physics (+1.9), with a measurable advantage over Vidu Q2. The clearest separation is on Physics (+1.9). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Physics | 45.7 | 43.8 |
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on prompt and logic (+2.7), with a measurable advantage over Vidu Q2. The clearest separation is on Scene Consistency (+5.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Adherence | 44.0 | 45.8 |
| Logic Consistency | 41.5 | 37.2 |
| Scene Consistency | 50.7 | 45.2 |
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on aesthetics (+3.4), with a measurable advantage over Vidu Q2. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+6.8). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cinematography | 53.4 | 46.6 |
| Taste | — | — |
| Quality | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Vidu Q2 leads on animation (+24.2), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on 3D Animation (+54.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Vidu Q2 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2D Animation | 27.7 | 38.0 |
| 3D Animation | 15.0 | 69.0 |
| Anime Animation | 54.3 | 62.7 |
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on humans (+8.4), with a measurable advantage over Vidu Q2. The clearest separation is on Hands (+18.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 55.3 | 49.7 |
| Hands | 77.3 | 59.0 |
| Actor Performance | 56.3 | 55.0 |
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on objects and animals (+20.1), with a measurable advantage over Vidu Q2. The clearest separation is on Objects (+23.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Objects | 57.6 | 34.4 |
| Animals | 55.1 | 38.1 |
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Veo 3.1 Fast leads on text (+15.7), with a measurable advantage over Vidu Q2. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+15.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Veo 3.1 Fast is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Text Fidelity | 47.7 | 32.0 |
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Vidu Q2 leads on cost and speed (+207.4), with a measurable advantage over Veo 3.1 Fast. The clearest separation is on Latency (+638.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Vidu Q2 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Veo 3.1 Fast | Vidu Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price / sec | $0.100 | $0.360 |
| Price / min | $6.00 | $21.60 |
| Latency | 638ms | 0ms |