Scores
Physics24.0
Prompt Adherence47.0
Animation14.3
2D Animation13.0
3D Animation17.0
Anime Animation13.0
Cinematography32.0
Human24.0
Hands19.0
Animals31.0
Objects31.0
Logic + Consistency25.0
Scene Consistency21.0
Text Fidelity6.0
Actor Performance47.0
Total Score26.0
Evaluation Summary
Good for
- •Prompt adherence
- •Keyframe capabilities
- •Actor performances (average)
Bad for
- •Most categories below average
- •Physics
- •Animation
Summary
Pika v2.2 is a pretty weak model across the board, with no category scoring above average. Its main strength is prompt adherence, so it clearly understands direction and follows prompts well. Actor performances are just about acceptable. The notable feature is keyframe capabilities, which few models have. Otherwise it falls apart in most categories.
Examples
Macro shot: a tattoo artist's gloved hands at work, needle buzzing against skin, other hand stretching the canvas taut. Ink, blood, precision. Five fingers per hand, always.
Cinematic slow-motion of a boxer throwing a punch at a heavy bag. Muscles contract in shoulders and arms, sweat flies, face shows exertion.
A woman practices yoga at sunrise on a cliff overlooking the ocean, flowing from warrior pose into a deep lunge. Wind catches her hair.
A futuristic city skyline at sunset, cinematic drone shot
Close up of a wrinkled elderly woman's weathered hands carefully folding an origami crane. Paper creases with each deliberate fold, fingers moving with practiced precision. Soft warm lighting, intimate macro detail.
A cinematic hummingbird hovering over vivid flowers at sunrise, 8s
close up of a man's face as he sits in a world war one trench, he is overwhelmed by emotion before breaking down into tears.
Tattoo needle writes CARPE DIEM across a woman's shoulder, her head turned in profile. The letters form one at a time, skin reddening realistically.
Blocks are removed one by one by two people, the tower wobbles, tilts and finally collapses, it falls. The removed blocks remain visible nearby.
Compare Models
48
48
Google
Veo 3 Fast
Cost/min$6.00
73
73
ByteDance
Seedance 2.0 Pro
Cost/min$9.00
52
52
Google
Veo 3.1 Fast
Cost/min$6.00
All Comparison Pages
| Rank | Model | Provider | Score | Compare Page |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Seedance 2.0 ProTop 5 | ByteDance | 73 | seedance-2-0-pro-vs-pika-v2-2 |
| #2 | Kling 3 ProTop 5 | Kling | 62 | kling-3-pro-vs-pika-v2-2 |
| #3 | Kling 2.6Top 5 | Kling | 60 | kling_2_6-vs-pika-v2-2 |
| #3 | Veo 3Top 5 | 60 | pika-v2-2-vs-veo_3 | |
| #5 | Grok Imagine 1.0Top 5 | xai | 59 | grok-imagine-1-0-vs-pika-v2-2 |
| #6 | Veo 3.1 | 57 | veo_3_1_preview-vs-pika-v2-2 | |
| #7 | PixVerse v5.5 | PixVerse | 55 | pika-v2-2-vs-pixverse-v5-5 |
| #7 | Veo 2 | 55 | pika-v2-2-vs-veo_2 | |
| #9 | Grok 2025 | xai | 54 | grok-vs-pika-v2-2 |
| #10 | Seedance 1.5 Pro | ByteDance | 53 | pika-v2-2-vs-seedance-1-5-pro |
| #11 | Veo 3.1 Fast | 52 | veo_3_1_fast_preview-vs-pika-v2-2 | |
| #12 | Sora 2 Pro | OpenAI | 50 | pika-v2-2-vs-sora_2_pro |
| #13 | Veo 3 Fast | 48 | pika-v2-2-vs-veo_3_fast | |
| #14 | Vidu Q2 | Vidu | 45 | pika-v2-2-vs-vidu-q2 |
| #15 | LTX-2 19B | Lightricks | 43 | ltx-2-19b-vs-pika-v2-2 |
| #16 | Gen-4.5 | Runway | 40 | pika-v2-2-vs-runway-ml-gen-4-5 |
| #18 | Infinity Star | FoundationVision | 25 | infinity-star-vs-pika-v2-2 |
Compare Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
59
59
vs
xai
Grok Imagine 1.0
54
54
vs
xai
Grok 2025
25
25
vs
FoundationVision
Infinity Star
62
62
vs
Kling
Kling 3 Pro
60
60
vs
Kling
Kling 2.6
+12 more comparisons available