Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

Legacy evaluation · V1

Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Seedance 1.5 Pro is the better overall choice over Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video. It scores higher in nearly every quality category shown.

Share
Add as preferred source
Seedance 1.5 Pro
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Our verdict

Seedance 1.5 Pro is the better choice

Seedance 1.5 Pro scores higher than Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video in nearly every quality category shown. Its biggest lead is in scene consistency, and it also is the only model here with audio output.

ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 1.5 Pro

53.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$3.11/min
Pika

Pika

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

26.0Overall score
Rank
—
Price per minute
$2.40/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Seedance 1.5 Pro

Seedance 1.5 Pro leads the overall score by 27.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video leads by 1.0 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video runs $2.40/min, against $3.11/min for Seedance 1.5 Pro.

Provider prices can change.

Best for

Built-in audio

Seedance 1.5 Pro

Seedance 1.5 Pro generates audio with the video; Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video does not.

This comparison does not score audio quality.

91
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Seedance 1.5 Pro wins 11 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapScene Consistency: Seedance 1.5 Pro ahead by 55.0 points.
Closest categoryText Fidelity: Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video ahead by 1.0 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Seedance 1.5 ProPika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Physics
36.6
23.7
Prompt Adherence
67.3
47.0
Logic Consistency
38.7
25.5
Scene Consistency
76.2
21.2
Cinematography
62.7
32.1
2D Animation
59.0
12.7
3D Animation
69.0
17.0
Human
56.6
24.3
Actor Performance
68.3
46.7
Objects
38.4
30.6
Animals
50.1
30.6
Text Fidelity
5.0
6.0

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video leads here by 1.0 points.

Matched Text outputs from Seedance 1.5 Pro and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Loading video
Seedance 1.5 Pro
Loading video
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Seedance 1.5 Pro leads here by 12.9 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Seedance 1.5 Pro and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Loading video
Seedance 1.5 Pro
Loading video
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Seedance 1.5 Pro leads here by 30.6 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Seedance 1.5 Pro and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Loading video
Seedance 1.5 Pro
Loading video
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

See full Seedance 1.5 Pro detailsSee full Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video details
CapabilitySeedance 1.5 ProPika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputNoNo
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo

FAQ

Common questions

Is Seedance 1.5 Pro better than Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Seedance 1.5 Pro is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Seedance 1.5 Pro cheaper than Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video costs less at $2.40 per minute, compared with $3.12 for Seedance 1.5 Pro.

Does Seedance 1.5 Pro generate audio?

Yes, Seedance 1.5 Pro includes audio output.

Does Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video generate audio?

No, Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video does not include audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Seedance 1.5 Pro or Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Seedance 1.5 Pro supports longer clips at 12 seconds, compared with 10 seconds for Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video.

Which model scores higher on Scene Consistency, Seedance 1.5 Pro or Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Seedance 1.5 Pro scores higher for scene consistency.

Which model scores higher on 3D Animation, Seedance 1.5 Pro or Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Seedance 1.5 Pro scores higher for 3D animation.

How are Seedance 1.5 Pro and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

Continue researching

Seedance 1.5 Pro

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Seedance 1.5 Pro and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
How v-benchmark v2.0 worksView the complete leaderboardRead model evaluation reports
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.