AI video model comparison

Gen-4.5 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Gen-4.5 is the better overall choice over Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video. It scores higher in nearly every quality category shown.

Share
Gen-4.5
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

“Try” links may be affiliate links — Megaton may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Our verdict

Gen-4.5 is the better choice

Gen-4.5 scores higher than Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video in nearly every quality category shown. Its biggest lead is in anime, but Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video costs less.

Runway

Runway

Gen-4.5

40.0Overall score
Rank
#18
Price per minute
$7.20/min
Pika

Pika

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

26.0Overall score
Rank
#19
Price per minute
$2.40/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Gen-4.5

Gen-4.5 leads the overall score by 14.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Gen-4.5

Gen-4.5 leads by 24.5 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video runs $2.40/min, against $7.20/min for Gen-4.5.

Provider prices can change.

164
videos rated
4,592
measurements
656
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Gen-4.5 wins 11 of 13 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapAnime Animation: Gen-4.5 ahead by 39.2 points.
Closest categoryPrompt Adherence: level

Head-to-head scores

13 categories rated head-to-head

Gen-4.5Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Physics
37.4
23.7
Prompt Adherence
47.0
47.0
Logic Consistency
35.6
25.5
Scene Consistency
38.1
21.2
Cinematography
44.0
32.1
2D Animation
41.0
12.7
3D Animation
38.5
17.0
Anime Animation
52.5
13.3
Hands
48.0
19.3
Actor Performance
38.0
46.7
Objects
42.4
30.6
Animals
40.2
30.6
Text Fidelity
30.5
6.0

Technical reliability

How reliably does each model deliver clean video?

These checks look for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, and unstable motion. They are kept separate from the reviewer scores above.

Gen-4.5
116 videos rated · Jul 2026
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
48 videos rated · Jul 2026

File reliability checks

Playback, framing, and motion stability

Gen-4.5Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Gen-4.5's biggest lead: Edge stability, 66.0 versus 50.0.

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video's biggest lead: Clean framing, 98.0% versus 91.0%.

Technical cleanliness
62.0%
54.0%

Clips with no freezes, bad framing, or severe compression problems.

Freeze-free playback
97.0%
100.0%

Clips that play without stalls or frozen frames.

Clean framing
91.0%
98.0%

Clips without unexpected black bars or cropped edges.

Motion stability
43.0
29.0

How consistently surfaces hold their shape and texture while moving.

Edge stability
66.0
50.0

How consistently object outlines remain clean while moving.

Side-by-side video tests

Same prompt, side by side

Both videos in each row were generated from the prompt shown. Watch them side by side to compare how each model handled the same request.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Gen-4.5 leads here by 24.5 points.

Show the full prompt

Street-level Tokyo: kanji, hiragana, katakana everywhere. Shop signs, vending machines, posters we follow a woman walking down the street.

Text videos generated from the same prompt by Gen-4.5 and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Gen-4.5
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Gen-4.5 leads here by 13.8 points.

Show the full prompt

Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.

Physics videos generated from the same prompt by Gen-4.5 and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Gen-4.5
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Gen-4.5 leads here by 11.9 points.

Show the full prompt

POV from inside a car trunk looking up at three figures who've just opened it. Wide lens, dramatic lighting from below, the perspective is specific and iconic.

Cinematography videos generated from the same prompt by Gen-4.5 and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Gen-4.5
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityGen-4.5Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesNo
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo

FAQ

Common questions

Is Gen-4.5 better than Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Gen-4.5 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Gen-4.5 cheaper than Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video costs less at $2.40 per minute, compared with $7.20 for Gen-4.5.

Does Gen-4.5 generate audio?

No, Gen-4.5 does not include audio output.

Does Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video generate audio?

No, Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video does not include audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Gen-4.5 or Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Both models list a 10-second maximum clip duration.

Which model scores higher on Anime Animation, Gen-4.5 or Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Gen-4.5 scores higher for anime.

Which model scores higher on Hands, Gen-4.5 or Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video?

Gen-4.5 scores higher for hands.

How are Gen-4.5 and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Seedance 2.0 vs Gen-4.5ByteDanceRunway73.0 / 40.0
Seedance 2.0 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoByteDancePika73.0 / 26.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5KlingRunway62.0 / 40.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoKlingPika62.0 / 26.0
Kling 2.6 vs Gen-4.5KlingRunway60.0 / 40.0
Veo 3 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway60.0 / 40.0
Kling 2.6 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoKlingPika60.0 / 26.0
Veo 3 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika60.0 / 26.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Gen-4.5xaiRunway58.0 / 40.0
Grok Imagine 1.0 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoxaiPika58.0 / 26.0
Veo 2 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway56.0 / 40.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway56.0 / 40.0
Veo 2 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika56.0 / 26.0
Veo 3.1 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika56.0 / 26.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs Gen-4.5PixVerseRunway55.0 / 40.0
Grok 2025 vs Gen-4.5xaiRunway54.0 / 40.0
PixVerse v5.5 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoPixVersePika55.0 / 26.0
Grok 2025 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoxaiPika54.0 / 26.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Gen-4.5ByteDanceRunway53.0 / 40.0
Seedance 1.5 Pro vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoByteDancePika53.0 / 26.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway51.0 / 40.0
Sora 2 Pro vs Gen-4.5OpenAIRunway50.0 / 40.0
Veo 3.1 Fast vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika51.0 / 26.0
Sora 2 Pro vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoOpenAIPika50.0 / 26.0
Veo 3 Fast vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway48.0 / 40.0
Veo 3 Fast vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoGooglePika48.0 / 26.0
Vidu Q2 vs Gen-4.5ViduRunway45.0 / 40.0
LTX-2 19B vs Gen-4.5LightricksRunway43.0 / 40.0
Vidu Q2 vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoViduPika45.0 / 26.0
LTX-2 19B vs Pika v2.2 Text-to-VideoLightricksPika43.0 / 26.0
Gen-4.5 vs Infinity StarRunwayFoundationVision40.0 / 24.0
Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video vs Infinity StarPikaFoundationVision26.0 / 24.0

Methodology

How we tested Gen-4.5 and Pika v2.2 Text-to-Video

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 164 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.