Legacy evaluation · V1

Grok 2025 vs Seedance 1.5 Pro

By Megaton TeamJuly 22, 2026

Grok 2025 is the better overall choice over Seedance 1.5 Pro. It scores higher in most quality categories shown.

Share
Grok 2025
Seedance 1.5 Pro
Our verdict

Grok 2025 is the better choice

Grok 2025 scores higher than Seedance 1.5 Pro in most quality categories shown. Its biggest lead is in text rendering, and it also supports longer clips.

xAI

xAI

Grok 2025

54.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$4.20/min
ByteDance

ByteDance

Seedance 1.5 Pro

53.0Overall score
Rank
Price per minute
$3.11/min

Best for

Highest overall score

Grok 2025

Grok 2025 leads the overall score by 1.0 points.

The overall score does not measure file reliability.

Best for

More readable text

Grok 2025

Grok 2025 leads by 32.0 points.

Long or moving text still needs manual review.

Best for

Lower generation cost

Seedance 1.5 Pro

Seedance 1.5 Pro runs $3.11/min, against $4.20/min for Grok 2025.

Provider prices can change.

87
videos rated
0
measurements
0
ratings
July 22, 2026
last updated

Reviewer scores

Scores by category

Grok 2025 wins 7 of 12 categories head-to-head. Each bar is the reviewer score out of 100.

Biggest gapActor Performance: Seedance 1.5 Pro ahead by 33.7 points.
Closest categoryHuman: Grok 2025 ahead by 1.3 points.

Head-to-head scores

12 categories rated head-to-head

Grok 2025Seedance 1.5 Pro
Physics
45.9
36.6
Prompt Adherence
54.5
67.3
Logic Consistency
43.3
38.7
Scene Consistency
66.9
76.2
Cinematography
52.7
62.7
2D Animation
72.5
59.0
3D Animation
67.7
69.0
Human
57.9
56.6
Actor Performance
34.7
68.3
Objects
53.1
38.4
Animals
54.5
50.1
Text Fidelity
37.0
5.0

Side-by-side video tests

Matched outputs, side by side

Each row uses the same evaluation input for both models. The underlying prompt and decision record are reserved for the full report.

Video test 1

Text

Spelling, letter shape, spacing, and whether the words remain stable while the scene moves.

Related category score

Grok 2025 leads here by 32.0 points.

Matched Text outputs from Grok 2025 and Seedance 1.5 Pro
Loading video
Grok 2025
Loading video
Seedance 1.5 Pro

Video test 2

Physics

Weight, contact, momentum, and whether objects continue to behave consistently from frame to frame.

Related category score

Grok 2025 leads here by 9.3 points.

Matched Physics outputs from Grok 2025 and Seedance 1.5 Pro
Loading video
Grok 2025
Loading video
Seedance 1.5 Pro

Video test 3

Cinematography

Framing, camera movement, lighting continuity, and whether the visual treatment follows the prompt.

Related category score

Seedance 1.5 Pro leads here by 10.0 points.

Matched Cinematography outputs from Grok 2025 and Seedance 1.5 Pro
Loading video
Grok 2025
Loading video
Seedance 1.5 Pro

Capabilities

Inputs and outputs

CapabilityGrok 2025Seedance 1.5 Pro
Text inputYesYes
Image inputYesYes
Video inputYesNo
Audio inputNoNo
Image outputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes

FAQ

Common questions

Is Grok 2025 better than Seedance 1.5 Pro?

Grok 2025 is better overall and leads most quality categories.

Is Grok 2025 cheaper than Seedance 1.5 Pro?

Seedance 1.5 Pro costs less at $3.12 per minute, compared with $4.20 for Grok 2025.

Does Grok 2025 generate audio?

Yes, Grok 2025 includes audio output.

Does Seedance 1.5 Pro generate audio?

Yes, Seedance 1.5 Pro includes audio output.

Which model makes longer clips, Grok 2025 or Seedance 1.5 Pro?

Grok 2025 supports longer clips at 15 seconds, compared with 12 seconds for Seedance 1.5 Pro.

Which model scores higher on Actor Performance, Grok 2025 or Seedance 1.5 Pro?

Seedance 1.5 Pro scores higher for actor performance.

Which model scores higher on Text Fidelity, Grok 2025 or Seedance 1.5 Pro?

Grok 2025 scores higher for text rendering.

How are Grok 2025 and Seedance 1.5 Pro compared?

Megaton gives both models the same prompts and compares the resulting videos. Price, audio support, and maximum clip length are also checked.

More comparisons

More AI video model comparisons

Browse more head-to-head results, including scores, prices, and side-by-side video tests.

Other AI video model comparison pages
ComparisonProvidersOverall scores
Kling 3 Pro vs Veo 3.1Kling AI (Kuaishou)Google76.0 / 63.0
Kling 3 Pro vs Gen-4.5Kling AI (Kuaishou)Runway76.0 / 61.0
Veo 3.1 vs Gen-4.5GoogleRunway63.0 / 61.0

Methodology

How we tested Grok 2025 and Seedance 1.5 Pro

We score two things separately: how good the video looks to a reviewer, and how reliably the file itself holds up. A model can make great-looking footage and still deliver clips with freezes, bad framing, or unstable motion.

We test every model with v-benchmark v2.0, our benchmark for AI video models — the same prompts, professional reviewers, and automated reliability checks behind every score here.

Reviewer scores
Both models receive the same prompts. Professional reviewers score how well each video follows the prompt and handles motion, composition, people, objects, animals, animation, and on-screen text. Scores use a 0-100 scale.
File reliability
Automated checks review 0 clips for freezes, bad framing, compression problems, unstable motion, distorted geometry, exposure problems, and invalid file properties.
Missing scores
Categories with a score for only one model are shown but excluded from the head-to-head win count. Price and generation speed stay separate because they use different units.
Last updated
Reviewer scores and rankings use results from July 22, 2026. Reliability results use the latest completed test for each model. Provider prices and rankings can change.
Subscribe to the Megaton newsletter

Get weekly AI video rankings, evaluation updates, and industry news delivered to your inbox.