#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0 Pro
#2
KlingKling 3 Pro
#3
KlingKling 2.6
#3
GoogleVeo 3
#5
xaiGrok Imagine 1.0
Compare

Grok vs Runway Gen-4.5

Grok 2025 edges out Gen-4.5 overall (Grok 2025 54.0 vs Gen-4.5 40.0.) Grok 2025 is a very respectable entry and for its model generation is probably one of the best for rapid iteration given the cost. Especially with a subscription, Grok allows you to generate a ton and is extremely competent. If you're looking for a cheap daily runner, this would be it. The main tradeoffs are in Deprecated model, where Gen-4.5 tends to score better.

xai
xai
Grok 2025
54
54
Total Score
Grok 2025
rank
#9
cost
0.00
/min
speed
0
ms
Runway
Runway
Gen-4.5
40
40
Total Score
Gen-4.5
rank
#16
cost
3.00
/min
speed
0
ms
Grok 2025xai
Gen-4.5Runway
Good for
  • Animation
  • Prompt and Logic
  • Objects and Animals
  • Physics
Good for
  • Humans
Bad for
  • Humans
Bad for
  • Animation
  • Prompt and Logic
  • Objects and Animals
Modalities
CapabilityGrok 2025Gen-4.5
Text input
Image input
Video input
Audio input
Image output
Audio output

Providers

xai
Provider
xai
xAI
xai is the platform that serves Grok 2025 requests, pricing, and availability.
Runway
Provider
Runway
runway-ml
Runway is the platform that serves Gen-4.5 requests, pricing, and availability.

Physics

Grok 2025 leads on physics (+8.5), with a measurable advantage over Gen-4.5. The clearest separation is on Physics (+8.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

Physics
Prompt
Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Physics
Prompt
Female javelin throwing athlete runs with a javelin and tosses it into the air.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Physics
Prompt
Olympic swimmer jumps into a pool and swims a full lap and emerges from the water on the other side of the pool
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5

Prompt and Logic

Grok 2025 leads on prompt and logic (+14.7), with a measurable advantage over Gen-4.5. The clearest separation is on Scene Consistency (+28.8). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside an opulent royal greenhouse filled with orchids, a blue ceramic watering can sits in the foreground on the left, and a terracotta pot with a single red tulip sits in the foreground on the right. A shallow reflecting pond runs through the middle and must show clear reflections. At second 2, a hummingbird enters from the top center and hovers directly above the tulip for exactly three seconds, then exits upward at second 5. The watering can and pot must remain fixed.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside a gilded palace ballroom with tall mirrors and a marble floor, a gold crown sits on a red velvet cushion on a small round table in the foreground. A silver candlestick stands exactly to the right of the cushion. In the background, a crystal chandelier hangs centered above the room. At second 2 the chandelier sways gently left-to-right for exactly three seconds; at second 6 a gloved hand enters from the left and extinguishes only the rightmost candle on the candlestick. The crown and cushion must never move.”
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a sci-fi hangar with glossy floors and strong backlight haze. Keep a parked spaceship on the left, a glowing door panel on the right wall, and a metal crate centered in the foreground. A female lead runs from the background toward the crate and pivots around it without touching it. A small drone swoops in from the right and scans her with a sweeping light beam as it passes overhead. She slides behind the crate for cover, then pops out and slaps the glowing door panel once. The door panel flashes brighter and she holds in a ready stance facing it. The crate must never move and the spaceship must remain stationary. No cuts.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5

Aesthetics

Grok 2025 leads on aesthetics (+4.5), with a measurable advantage over Gen-4.5. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+8.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

Cinematography
Prompt
POV from inside a car trunk looking up at three figures who've just opened it. Wide lens, dramatic lighting from below, the perspective is specific and iconic.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Cinematography
Prompt
One-take chase: camera leads a woman sprinting through a crowded market, she's looking back in fear, we never see what's chasing her. Handheld urgency, motivated motion, ducking under obstacles.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Taste
Prompt
A cinematic hummingbird hovering over vivid flowers at sunrise, 8s
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5

Animation

Grok 2025 leads on animation (+15.9), with a measurable advantage over Gen-4.5. The clearest separation is on 2D Animation (+31.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

2D Animation
Prompt
Golden age cartoon chaos 2D cel-shaded animation style: a coyote runs off a cliff, hangs in mid-air, holds up a tiny sign that says "HELP," then plummets. Classic timing, smear frames, dust cloud impact.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
3D Animation
Prompt
Action-adventure CG: a fierce Viking warrior rides a dragon through a narrow sea stack canyon at high speed. Braided beard and fur cloak whipping in the wind, dragon wings tucking and flaring. Dynamic camera, motion blur, cinematic framing.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
3D Animation
Prompt
Animated CGI kid's cartoon style: a playful squirrel leaps between tree branches in a colorful forest, but every other frame is held like a storybook illustration. Bright colors, exaggerated expressions, motion lines, intentionally bouncy yet fluid animation.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5

Humans

Gen-4.5 leads on humans (+5.8), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Hands (+8.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Gen-4.5 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

Human
Prompt
A punk rock drummer absolutely destroys a kit, sticks blurring, head thrashing. Freeze for a moment on her mid-scream face, then resume chaos.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Human
Prompt
Cinematic slow-motion of a boxer throwing a punch at a heavy bag. Muscles contract in shoulders and arms, sweat flies, face shows exertion.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Hands
Prompt
Close up of a wrinkled elderly woman's weathered hands carefully folding an origami crane. Paper creases with each deliberate fold, fingers moving with practiced precision. Soft warm lighting, intimate macro detail.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5

Objects and Animals

Grok 2025 leads on objects and animals (+12.5), with a measurable advantage over Gen-4.5. The clearest separation is on Animals (+14.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

Animals
Prompt
A wet dog shakes itself dry in glorious slow motion. Water droplets spiral off. Fur contorts into absurd shapes. Joy radiates from its face.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Animals
Prompt
Slow motion hummingbird: wings frozen mid-beat, iridescent throat catching light, tongue extending into a flower.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Animals
Prompt
Pod of orcas hunting in coordinated precision. Underwater ballet—sleek bodies, powerful flukes before they rise to the surface and leap into the air before splashing back down.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5

Text

Grok 2025 leads on text (+6.5), with a measurable advantage over Gen-4.5. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+6.5). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

Text Fidelity
Prompt
Times Square at night: massive LED billboards display rotating ads. COCA-COLA, SAMSUNG, BROADWAY SHOWS.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Action scene, cinematic and dynamic: A female lead in a dark tactical jacket sprints through a rain-soaked museum hall at night. The hall has three distinct landmarks: (1) a huge dinosaur skeleton on the left, (2) a glass display case with a glowing blue gem centered in the background, and (3) a marble staircase on the right.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a dark planetarium exhibit. A mechanical orrery rotates smoothly: small planets circle a glowing central sun in repeating loops. The camera makes a slow arc around the orrery while the planets continue their motion.”
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5

Cost and Speed

Grok 2025 leads on cost and speed (+1.0), with a measurable advantage over Gen-4.5. The clearest separation is on Price / min (+3.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
MetricGrok 2025Gen-4.5

Prompt Comparisons

Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous macro shot inside a watchmaker’s workshop. Extreme close-up of tweezers placing a tiny brass gear into a mechanical watch movement. The engraved markings on the gear remain crisp and identical frame-to-frame. The tweezers and gear never warp or change shape, and the camera motion is a smooth, slow push-in with no jitter. The gear teeth must not shimmer or crawl as it settles into place.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Hands
Prompt
A pianist's hands playing Chopin—arched wrists, curved fingers, striking keys with controlled force. We see both hands in frame, moving independently.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5
Anime Animation
Prompt
Seinen dramatic japanese anime style: a lone samurai stands on a moonlit cliff overlooking a misty valley. Wind sweeps through his robes and loose hair. He unsheathes his katana—the blade gleams—cherry blossom petals swirl around him. Atmospheric tension, cinematic framing, ink wash backgrounds.
Grok 2025
vs
Gen-4.5