Compare
Grok vs Kling 3 Pro
Kling 3 Pro edges out Grok 2025 overall (Grok 2025 54.0 vs Kling 3 Pro 62.0.) Kling 3 Pro is a clear upgrade from Kling 2.6 and the Veo 3.1 models on most dimensions. It excels at human performance and emotive acting, has some of the best prompt understanding of any model, and produces cinematic, well-composed shots with standout animal realism. It can very fluidly go from slow motion to regular speed, showing really good temporal coherence. It can generate some nonsensical outputs, so expect to run a few prompts to get it right. But when it gets it right, it's quite good. 2D animation and anime are average. Text rendering is just okay and may require some re-prompting. The main tradeoffs are in Expensive, Can generate nonsensical outputs, where Grok 2025 tends to score better.
Grok 2025xai | Kling 3 ProKling |
|---|---|
Good for
| Good for
|
Bad for
| Bad for
|
Modalities
| Capability | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Text input | ||
| Image input | ||
| Video input | ||
| Audio input | — | — |
| Image output | ||
| Audio output | — | — |
Providers
Physics
How well the model simulates real-world physics: gravity, momentum, collisions, and natural movement.
Kling 3 Pro leads on physics (+13.4), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Physics (+13.4). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If physics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Physics
Prompt
Close-up: a match strikes, flares to life, lights a candle. The match head, the flame birth, the wick catching. Material accuracy across wood, phosphorus, wax, fire.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Physics
Prompt
Olympic swimmer jumps into a pool and swims a full lap and emerges from the water on the other side of the pool
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside an opulent royal greenhouse filled with orchids, a blue ceramic watering can sits in the foreground on the left, and a terracotta pot with a single red tulip sits in the foreground on the right. A shallow reflecting pond runs through the middle and must show clear reflections. At second 2, a hummingbird enters from the top center and hovers directly above the tulip for exactly three seconds, then exits upward at second 5. The watering can and pot must remain fixed.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt and Logic
Measures how accurately the model follows prompts and maintains logical consistency throughout the video.
Kling 3 Pro leads on prompt and logic (+7.1), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Logic Consistency (+18.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If prompt and logic is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Inside a gilded palace ballroom with tall mirrors and a marble floor, a gold crown sits on a red velvet cushion on a small round table in the foreground. A silver candlestick stands exactly to the right of the cushion. In the background, a crystal chandelier hangs centered above the room. At second 2 the chandelier sways gently left-to-right for exactly three seconds; at second 6 a gloved hand enters from the left and extinguishes only the rightmost candle on the candlestick. The crown and cushion must never move.”
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a sci-fi hangar with glossy floors and strong backlight haze. Keep a parked spaceship on the left, a glowing door panel on the right wall, and a metal crate centered in the foreground. A female lead runs from the background toward the crate and pivots around it without touching it. A small drone swoops in from the right and scans her with a sweeping light beam as it passes overhead. She slides behind the crate for cover, then pops out and slaps the glowing door panel once. The door panel flashes brighter and she holds in a ready stance facing it. The crate must never move and the spaceship must remain stationary. No cuts.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Prompt Adherence
Prompt
Action scene, cinematic and dynamic: A female lead in a dark tactical jacket sprints through a rain-soaked museum hall at night. The hall has three distinct landmarks: (1) a huge dinosaur skeleton on the left, (2) a glass display case with a glowing blue gem centered in the background, and (3) a marble staircase on the right.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Aesthetics
Visual quality including cinematography, artistic taste, and overall production value.
Kling 3 Pro leads on aesthetics (+5.4), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Cinematography (+10.6). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If aesthetics is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Cinematography
Prompt
One-take chase: camera leads a woman sprinting through a crowded market, she's looking back in fear, we never see what's chasing her. Handheld urgency, motivated motion, ducking under obstacles.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Taste
Prompt
A cinematic hummingbird hovering over vivid flowers at sunrise, 8s
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous shot in a dark planetarium exhibit. A mechanical orrery rotates smoothly: small planets circle a glowing central sun in repeating loops. The camera makes a slow arc around the orrery while the planets continue their motion.”
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Animation
Performance on animated content styles including 2D, 3D, and anime-style animation.
Grok 2025 leads on animation (+7.0), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on 2D Animation (+25.2). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If animation is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
2D Animation
Prompt
Golden age cartoon chaos 2D cel-shaded animation style: a coyote runs off a cliff, hangs in mid-air, holds up a tiny sign that says "HELP," then plummets. Classic timing, smear frames, dust cloud impact.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
2D Animation
Prompt
Hand-drawn puppy 2D cel-shaded animation style: a golden retriever pup with floppy ears chases a butterfly through a meadow, trips over its own paws, rolls, and bounds up joyfully. Watercolor backgrounds, expressive line work, heartwarming motion.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
Action-adventure CG: a fierce Viking warrior rides a dragon through a narrow sea stack canyon at high speed. Braided beard and fur cloak whipping in the wind, dragon wings tucking and flaring. Dynamic camera, motion blur, cinematic framing.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Humans
Accuracy of human rendering including body proportions, hand details, and realistic actor performances.
Kling 3 Pro leads on humans (+27.5), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Actor Performance (+46.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If humans is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Human
Prompt
A punk rock drummer absolutely destroys a kit, sticks blurring, head thrashing. Freeze for a moment on her mid-scream face, then resume chaos.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Human
Prompt
Cinematic slow-motion of a boxer throwing a punch at a heavy bag. Muscles contract in shoulders and arms, sweat flies, face shows exertion.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Hands
Prompt
Close up of a wrinkled elderly woman's weathered hands carefully folding an origami crane. Paper creases with each deliberate fold, fingers moving with practiced precision. Soft warm lighting, intimate macro detail.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Objects and Animals
Quality of rendering inanimate objects and animals with accurate shapes, textures, and movements.
Kling 3 Pro leads on objects and animals (+8.1), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Animals (+11.3). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If objects and animals is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Animals
Prompt
A wet dog shakes itself dry in glorious slow motion. Water droplets spiral off. Fur contorts into absurd shapes. Joy radiates from its face.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Animals
Prompt
Pod of orcas hunting in coordinated precision. Underwater ballet—sleek bodies, powerful flukes before they rise to the surface and leap into the air before splashing back down.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Scene Consistency
Prompt
Single continuous macro shot inside a watchmaker’s workshop. Extreme close-up of tweezers placing a tiny brass gear into a mechanical watch movement. The engraved markings on the gear remain crisp and identical frame-to-frame. The tweezers and gear never warp or change shape, and the camera motion is a smooth, slow push-in with no jitter. The gear teeth must not shimmer or crawl as it settles into place.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Text
Ability to render readable, accurate text and typography within generated videos.
Kling 3 Pro leads on text (+16.7), with a measurable advantage over Grok 2025. The clearest separation is on Text Fidelity (+16.7). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If text is a priority for your prompts, Kling 3 Pro is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
Text Fidelity
Prompt
Times Square at night: massive LED billboards display rotating ads. COCA-COLA, SAMSUNG, BROADWAY SHOWS.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Hands
Prompt
A pianist's hands playing Chopin—arched wrists, curved fingers, striking keys with controlled force. We see both hands in frame, moving independently.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
3D Animation
Prompt
CGI animated kitten discovers snow: a fluffy orange tabby steps onto fresh powder for the first time, paw sinking in. Startled shake, curious sniff, then gleeful pouncing. Fur dynamics, subsurface scattering on ears, irresistible charm.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Cost and Speed
Practical factors including pricing per video and generation latency.
Grok 2025 leads on cost and speed (+20000.2), with a measurable advantage over Kling 3 Pro. The clearest separation is on Latency (+60000.0). Across the other sub-metrics in this group, the gap is smaller but generally consistent with the overall direction. If cost and speed is a priority for your prompts, Grok 2025 is the safer pick here.
| Metric | Grok 2025 | Kling 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Comparisons
3D Animation
Prompt
Animated CGI kid's cartoon style: a playful squirrel leaps between tree branches in a colorful forest, but every other frame is held like a storybook illustration. Bright colors, exaggerated expressions, motion lines, intentionally bouncy yet fluid animation.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Anime Animation
Prompt
Seinen dramatic japanese anime style: a lone samurai stands on a moonlit cliff overlooking a misty valley. Wind sweeps through his robes and loose hair. He unsheathes his katana—the blade gleams—cherry blossom petals swirl around him. Atmospheric tension, cinematic framing, ink wash backgrounds.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro
Anime Animation
Prompt
Shonen power-up japanese anime style: a fighter screams as golden aura explodes around him, rocks levitate, the ground cracks. Hair spikes upward, muscles bulge. Speed lines, lens flares, the whole absurd beautiful spectacle.
Grok 2025
vs
Kling 3 Pro