Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
AlibabaWan 3.0
#3
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#4
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#5
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Swipe for more top models

<report>

MiniMax

H3 Max Turbo

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Generated via fal.ai · September 2, 2026Evaluated · September 10, 2026Leaderboard rank #9 of 15Last updated · September 10, 2026

73.06

/ 100

Try H3 Max Turbo ↗Add as preferred source

Affiliate link: Megaton may earn a commission if you purchase, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Get the latest video releases and leaderboard updates

Categories

Weight
C01Prompt Adherence20%87.49C02Scene Consistency10%84.67C03Physics20%50.59C04Human Fidelity10%75.93C052D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%75.00C063D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%74.00C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry2.5%74.29C08Taste & Art Direction6.5%66.11C09Animal & Creature Fidelity1.5%81.43C10Object & Product Fidelity1.5%85.79C11Causal & Semantic Coherence7.5%69.09C12Text Fidelity1.5%80.00C13Character Performance & Acting1.5%69.00C14Delivered File & Playback Integrity0.5%100.00C15Quality + Reliability2%81.69

Get the full report

Get the H3 Max Turbo test results, reviewer notes, and model comparisons.

Are you part of the MiniMax team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
View paid access →Request a complimentary full report →

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

87.5

38 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Prompt requirements are fulfilled reliably across the set, with only isolated misses or ambiguities.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential10
Major18
Minor15

38 videos

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

40.0

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time only partly reliably, with frequent important failures.

This Category

84.7

36 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Temporal and spatial continuity is highly reliable, with only isolated drift or regeneration.

Violations

This Video
Essential1
Major0
Minor1
This Category
Essential16
Major22
Minor10

36 videos

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended physical event is recognizable, but repeated important defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

50.6

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended physical events are recognizable, but repeated defects leave overall performance uneven.

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, uncanny, or anatomically strained.

This Category

75.9

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human fidelity is strong overall, with recurring but non-disruptive issues.

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

90.0

This Video · Assessment

Exceptional professional work with memorable choices, strong intent, and excellent command of the medium.

This Category

75.0

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The work is strongly and convincingly 2D overall, though execution or authorship is less consistent than the highest tier.

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended 3D animation is recognizable, but repeated technical or expressive defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

74.0

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The work is technically strong and convincing overall, though craft or artistic limitations recur.

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Strong cinematography with noticeable limitations or less-developed choices.

This Category

74.3

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Shot design is technically strong overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less expressive.

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Competent but visibly reliant on familiar AI aesthetics or underdeveloped art direction.

This Category

66.1

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Art direction is generally capable, but generic, unresolved, or less-confident choices recur.

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Strong and professional, with a few visible but non-disruptive issues.

This Category

81.4

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Animal and creature fidelity is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

85.8

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Object and product fidelity is highly reliable, with only isolated detail or material failures.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential8
Major5
Minor1

8 videos

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

The central event is coherent, but several actions or relationships feel strained or unexplained.

This Category

69.1

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Central events are generally understandable, but strained or unexplained actions and relationships recur.

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability with near-complete consistency.

This Category

80.0

6 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Text fidelity is highly reliable, with only isolated content, placement, or temporal defects.

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential5
Major4
Minor1

6 videos

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Professional, clear, and convincing, but more conventional or less nuanced.

This Category

69.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Acting is generally believable, but synthetic timing, expression, attention, or specificity recurs.

Differences between other models

CategoryH3 Max TurboMiniMax Hailuo 03MiniMax H3 MaxGemini Omni FlashKling 3 Standard
C01Prompt Adherence87.590.392.990.582.6
C03Physics50.656.554.758.857.6
C02Scene Consistency84.790.280.381.182.5
C04Human Fidelity75.984.472.273.679.6
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry75.057.573.342.546.4
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry74.067.572.062.066.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence69.177.375.562.766.4
C08Taste & Art Direction66.165.265.859.863.1
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry74.378.678.672.975.7
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity81.472.980.075.771.4
C10Object & Product Fidelity85.881.793.599.090.0
C12Text Fidelity80.090.081.876.330.3
C13Character Performance & Acting69.063.062.063.059.0

Leaderboard

<Cite this report>

Citation snippet

Copy a plain-text citation for articles and research.

Megaton. “H3 Max Turbo V-Benchmark v2 report.” Version 1.4.0, September 10, 2026. https://megaton.ai/evaluations/minimax/h3-max-turbo/report

Report badge

The badge links to this report so readers can verify the ranking.

H3 Max Turbo is ranked #9 in Megaton V-Benchmark v2

Structured data access

Request licensed access to structured evaluation data for research or commercial use.

DATA

Request data access

Methodology

Our score is based on our v-benchmark v2 methodology. This is a Core 36 evaluation with 86.07% weighted coverage, not a Full evaluation.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Published
September 10, 2026
V-Benchmark version
2.0.0
Megaton Index
73.06
Published rank
9 of 15
View model changelog →

<What you get>

  • The prompts and outputs used in our tests.
  • Scores and notes explaining each result.
  • Comparisons with other models and versions.

<Who can get access>

  • Are you part of the MiniMax team? Please reach out for complimentary access.
  • University and nonprofit researchers can ask about research access.
  • Paid access starts at $2,500 per report.
Access option

We’ll use these details to reply to your request.