Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#3
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#4
Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 3 Pro
#5
MiniMaxMiniMax Hailuo 03

Swipe for more top models

<report>

Post Trained byfal.ai
Trained byMiniMax

MiniMax H3 Max

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Evaluated · August 27, 2026Leaderboard rank #6 of 12Last updated · August 27, 2026

74.22

/ 100

Categories

Weight
C01Prompt Adherence20%92.86C02Scene Consistency10%80.33C03Physics20%54.71C04Human Fidelity10%72.22C052D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%73.33C063D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%72.00C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry2.5%78.57C08Taste & Art Direction6.5%66.39C09Animal & Creature Fidelity1.5%80.00C10Object & Product Fidelity1.5%93.54C11Causal & Semantic Coherence7.5%75.45C12Text Fidelity1.5%81.85C13Character Performance & Acting1.5%62.00

Get the complete MiniMax H3 Max category evidence, comparison videos, and version analysis.

If you work at fal.ai and want full access to the evaluation, please reach out directly to receive a full complimentary report.
View paid access →Request a complimentary full report →

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

92.9

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Across the evaluated prompts, explicit subjects, actions, relationships, negations, and required text are fulfilled with near-complete consistency.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time with near-complete consistency.

This Category

80.3

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Temporal and spatial continuity is highly reliable, with only isolated drift or regeneration.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

40.0

This Video · Assessment

The event occurs, but its physical behavior is clearly implausible.

This Category

54.7

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended physical events are recognizable, but repeated defects leave overall performance uneven.

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, uncanny, or anatomically strained.

This Category

72.2

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human fidelity is strong overall, with recurring but non-disruptive issues.

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Technically excellent and fully professional, but more conventional or less expressive than the highest tier.

This Category

73.3

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The work is strongly and convincingly 2D overall, though execution or authorship is less consistent than the highest tier.

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended 3D animation is recognizable, but repeated technical or expressive defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

72.0

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The work is technically strong and convincing overall, though craft or artistic limitations recur.

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Technically excellent and fully professional, but more conventional or less expressive.

This Category

78.6

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Shot design is technically strong overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less expressive.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Polished, professional, and coherent, but more conventional or less distinctive.

This Category

66.4

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Art direction is generally capable, but generic, unresolved, or less-confident choices recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

Fully convincing anatomy, surfaces, movement, and behavior within the requested species or creature design.

This Category

80.0

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Animal and creature fidelity is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

93.5

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested objects preserve identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

The event remains understandable, but noticeable contradictions appear.

This Category

75.5

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Events remain clear overall, though recurring logical irregularities are visible but bounded.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability with near-complete consistency.

This Category

81.8

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Text fidelity is highly reliable, with only isolated content, placement, or temporal defects.

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Readable but synthetic, generalized, or mechanically delivered.

This Category

62.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Acting is generally believable, but synthetic timing, expression, attention, or specificity recurs.

Differences between other models

CategoryMiniMax H3 MaxKling 3 ProMiniMax Hailuo 03Gemini Omni FlashKling 3 Standard
C01Prompt Adherence92.984.790.390.582.6
C03Physics54.770.056.558.857.6
C02Scene Consistency80.390.290.281.182.5
C04Human Fidelity72.290.084.473.679.6
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry73.359.257.542.544.5
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry72.058.067.562.066.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence75.576.477.362.766.4
C08Taste & Art Direction66.465.865.360.063.3
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry78.667.178.672.975.7
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity80.080.072.975.771.4
C10Object & Product Fidelity93.589.781.699.089.9
C12Text Fidelity81.824.390.076.330.3
C13Character Performance & Acting62.078.063.063.059.0

Leaderboard

Methodology

The Megaton Index is the published 0–100 weighted summary for v-benchmark v2. This public report shows the model's Index and category scores; the full calibration evidence, decision records, and scoring implementation are reserved for the full report.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Published
August 27, 2026
V-Benchmark version
2.1.0
Megaton Index
74.22
Published rank
6 of 12
View model changelog →