<report>

Google

Gemini Omni Flash

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Evaluated · August 11, 2026Leaderboard rank #6 of 11Last updated · August 11, 2026

70.22

/ 100

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

90.5

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Across the evaluated prompts, explicit subjects, actions, relationships, negations, and required text are fulfilled with near-complete consistency.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time with near-complete consistency.

This Category

81.1

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Temporal and spatial continuity is highly reliable, with only isolated drift or regeneration.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Believable at first viewing, with clear physical defects on inspection.

This Category

58.8

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended physical events are recognizable, but repeated defects leave overall performance uneven.

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, uncanny, or anatomically strained.

This Category

73.6

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human fidelity is strong overall, with recurring but non-disruptive issues.

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

10.0

This Video · Assessment

The result does not meaningfully function or read as the requested 2D animation.

This Category

42.5

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Coherent 2D craft appears only in some cases; line, timing, pose, or medium-authenticity failures recur frequently.

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

55.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic, mechanical, stiff, or underdeveloped.

This Category

62.0

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

3D animation is generally coherent, but synthetic, mechanical, stiff, or underdeveloped execution recurs.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent and competent but synthetic, mechanical, or visually underdeveloped.

This Category

72.9

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Shot design is technically strong overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less expressive.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Polished, professional, and coherent, but more conventional or less distinctive.

This Category

60.0

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Art direction is generally capable, but generic, unresolved, or less-confident choices recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

50.0

This Video · Assessment

The intended animal or creature is clearly recognizable, but repeated anatomical or behavioral defects leave it only partly convincing.

This Category

75.7

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Fidelity is strong overall, with recurring but non-disruptive anatomical or behavioral issues.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

93.5

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

99.0

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested objects preserve identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

30.0

This Video · Assessment

Severe causal, role, or state-transition failures.

This Category

62.7

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Central events are generally understandable, but strained or unexplained actions and relationships recur.

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability with near-complete consistency.

This Category

76.3

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested text remains correct and stable overall, though recurring secondary typography or motion issues are visible.

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Believable overall, with visible limitations in timing, expression, or specificity.

This Category

63.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Acting is generally believable, but synthetic timing, expression, attention, or specificity recurs.

Differences between other models

CategoryGemini Omni FlashKling 3 ProMiniMax Hailuo 03Kling 3 StandardSeedance 2.0 Mini
C01Prompt Adherence90.584.790.382.687.7
C03Physics58.870.056.557.650.6
C02Scene Consistency81.190.290.282.578.0
C04Human Fidelity73.690.084.479.664.8
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry42.559.257.544.561.7
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry62.058.067.566.062.0
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence62.776.477.366.470.9
C08Taste & Art Direction60.065.865.363.360.7
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry72.967.178.675.764.3
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity75.780.072.971.482.9
C10Object & Product Fidelity99.089.781.689.988.4
C12Text Fidelity76.324.390.030.363.8
C13Character Performance & Acting63.078.063.059.063.0

Leaderboard

Methodology

The Megaton Index is the published 0–100 weighted summary for v-benchmark v2. This public report shows the model's Index and category scores; the full calibration evidence, decision records, and scoring implementation are reserved for the full report.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Videos generated by
Google API on August 11, 2026
Evaluated
August 11, 2026
Benchmark
v-benchmark v2 by Megaton
Publication
1.0.0