Megaton
#1
ByteDanceSeedance 2.5
#2
ByteDanceSeedance 2.0
#3
Black Forest LabsFLUX 3
#4
GoogleGemini Omni 1.1 Flash
#5
Kling AI (Kuaishou)Kling 3 Pro

Swipe for more top models

<report>

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

v-benchmark v2 by Megaton benchmark
Evaluated · August 28, 2026Leaderboard rank #4 of 13Last updated · August 28, 2026

76.24

/ 100

Categories

Weight
C01Prompt Adherence20%87.22C02Scene Consistency10%88.78C03Physics20%58.24C04Human Fidelity10%87.04C052D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%67.08C063D Animation Craft & Artistry7.5%76.00C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry2.5%68.57C08Taste & Art Direction6.5%66.39C09Animal & Creature Fidelity1.5%87.14C10Object & Product Fidelity1.5%99.14C11Causal & Semantic Coherence7.5%72.73C12Text Fidelity1.5%92.13C13Character Performance & Acting1.5%74.00C14Delivered File & Playback Integrity0.5%100.00C15Quality + Reliability2%78.45

Get the complete Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash category evidence, comparison videos, and version analysis.

If you work at Google and want full access to the evaluation, please reach out directly to receive a full complimentary report.
View paid access →Request a complimentary full report →

Categories

C01

Prompt AdherenceWhether every explicit, observable instruction in the prompt is fulfilled.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video fulfills its explicit, observable instructions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

87.2

36 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Prompt requirements are fulfilled reliably across the set, with only isolated misses or ambiguities.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential10
Major12
Minor9

36 videos

C02

Scene ConsistencyWhether established subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting remain coherent over time.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video maintains subjects, objects, spatial relationships, environment, and lighting over time with near-complete consistency.

This Category

88.8

36 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Temporal and spatial continuity is highly reliable, with only isolated drift or regeneration.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential19
Major13
Minor11

36 videos

C03

PhysicsWhether the central motion, force, material, and reaction behave coherently in the requested world and style.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Coherent but noticeably synthetic or physically strained.

This Category

58.2

17 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The intended physical events are recognizable, but repeated defects leave overall performance uneven.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C04

Human FidelityWhether faces, eyes, skin, bodies, hands, motion, and human presence remain anatomically and perceptually convincing.

This Video

90.0

This Video · Assessment

Highly convincing, with one very small localized defect.

This Category

87.0

27 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Human rendering is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C05

2D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality and artistic authorship of intentionally 2D animation within its requested conventions.

This Video

80.0

This Video · Assessment

Technically excellent and fully professional, but more conventional or less expressive than the highest tier.

This Category

67.1

12 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

2D animation is generally coherent and capable, but synthetic motion or underdeveloped artistic choices recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C06

3D Animation Craft & ArtistryThe quality, coherence, and artistic authorship of intentionally 3D animation.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Strong and convincing, with visible craft or artistic limitations.

This Category

76.0

5 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

The work is technically strong and convincing overall, though craft or artistic limitations recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C07

Cinematography Craft & ArtistryShot design, framing, camera movement, lighting, focus, visual hierarchy, and intentional filmmaking authorship.

This Video

70.0

This Video · Assessment

Strong cinematography with noticeable limitations or less-developed choices.

This Category

68.6

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Cinematography is generally coherent and capable, but mechanical or underdeveloped visual choices recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C08

Taste & Art DirectionThe strength, specificity, coherence, and artistic authorship of the result as a finished creative choice.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Competent but visibly reliant on familiar AI aesthetics or underdeveloped art direction.

This Category

66.4

60 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Art direction is generally capable, but generic, unresolved, or less-confident choices recur.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C09

Animal & Creature FidelityWhether real animals and designed creatures preserve convincing anatomy, identity, motion, behavior, and interaction.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

Fully convincing anatomy, surfaces, movement, and behavior within the requested species or creature design.

This Category

87.1

7 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Animal and creature fidelity is highly convincing across the set, with only small localized defects.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C10

Object & Product FidelityWhether requested objects have correct identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions.

This Video

100.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves the requested objects’ identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

This Category

99.1

8 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested objects preserve identity, structure, materials, details, motion, and interactions with near-complete consistency.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential0
Major0
Minor0
This Category
Essential0
Major1
Minor0

8 videos

C11

Causal & Semantic CoherenceWhether events, relationships, transformations, and cause-and-effect remain semantically coherent, including surreal premises.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

The central event is coherent, but several actions or relationships feel strained or unexplained.

This Category

72.7

11 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Events remain clear overall, though recurring logical irregularities are visible but bounded.

Models that scored similarly on this category

C12

Text FidelityWhether requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability are correct.

This Video

75.0

This Video · Assessment

This video preserves requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and temporal stability reliably overall, with bounded recurring limitations.

This Category

92.1

6 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Requested text content, typography, placement, attachment, legibility, and stability are correct with near-complete consistency.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Violations

This Video
Essential3
Major2
Minor0
This Category
Essential7
Major2
Minor0

6 videos

C13

Character Performance & ActingWhether character intention, emotion, timing, reactions, eyelines, gesture, and performance read convincingly.

This Video

60.0

This Video · Assessment

Readable but synthetic, generalized, or mechanically delivered.

This Category

74.0

21 videos were rated for this category

This Category · Assessment

Performances are professional and convincing overall, though recurring choices are more conventional or less nuanced.

Models that scored similarly on this category

Differences between other models

CategoryGemini Omni 1.1 FlashSeedance 2.0FLUX 3Kling 3 ProMiniMax Hailuo 03
C01Prompt Adherence87.287.487.184.790.3
C03Physics58.266.570.670.056.5
C02Scene Consistency88.892.294.890.290.2
C04Human Fidelity87.082.273.790.084.4
C052D Animation Craft & Artistry67.166.760.459.257.5
C063D Animation Craft & Artistry76.070.066.058.067.5
C11Causal & Semantic Coherence72.780.980.976.477.3
C08Taste & Art Direction66.463.265.065.865.3
C07Cinematography Craft & Artistry68.668.671.467.178.6
C09Animal & Creature Fidelity87.180.075.780.072.9
C10Object & Product Fidelity99.198.283.889.781.6
C12Text Fidelity92.185.882.424.390.0
C13Character Performance & Acting74.066.768.078.063.0

Leaderboard

Methodology

The Megaton Index is the published 0–100 weighted summary for v-benchmark v2. This public report shows the model's Index and category scores; the full calibration evidence, decision records, and scoring implementation are reserved for the full report.

Read the full methodology →

Changelog

Published
August 28, 2026
V-Benchmark version
2.0.0
Megaton Index
76.24
Published rank
4 of 13
View model changelog →